2019
DOI: 10.4236/ojer.2019.82007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The INFREP Network: Present Situation and Recent Results

Abstract: VLF/LF (20-300 kHz) radio waves propagation is affected by different factors such as meteorological conditions, solar bursts and geomagnetic activity. At the same time, variations of some parameters in the ground, in the atmosphere and in the ionosphere occurring during the preparatory phase of earthquakes can produce disturbances in the propagation of the previous signals along their radio paths: these disturbances are the radio precursors. Since 2009, several VLF/LF radio receivers have been installed throug… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(10 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wavelet transform is used to detect any anomaly in radio data (Torrence and Compo, 1998). Earthquake temporal prediction (Wavelet analysis) has been used in many case studies related to radio wave perturbations and their relationship with earthquakes (Biagi et al, 2019;Righetti et al, 2012). Changes in VLF/LF amplitude data are very different from one path to another, so we need to analyse and compare data from different propagation paths in some ways.…”
Section: Earthquake Temporal Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wavelet transform is used to detect any anomaly in radio data (Torrence and Compo, 1998). Earthquake temporal prediction (Wavelet analysis) has been used in many case studies related to radio wave perturbations and their relationship with earthquakes (Biagi et al, 2019;Righetti et al, 2012). Changes in VLF/LF amplitude data are very different from one path to another, so we need to analyse and compare data from different propagation paths in some ways.…”
Section: Earthquake Temporal Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Righetti et al (2012) investigated the relationship between LF radio signals received in the European VLF/LF network from July 2009 to April 2011 with earthquakes greater than M=5 using wavelet analysis. Biagi et al (2019) investigated the seismic activities occurring within the European VLF/LF network from 2016 to 2017 by wavelet analysis. Most of the previous research have been based on one or some limited transmitter-receiver VLF/LF wave paths (Asano and Hayakawa, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wave propagation between narrowband very low frequency (VLF; f = 3-30 kHz) and low frequency (LF; f = 30-300 kHz) transmitter and receiver stations is confined in this cavity, e.g., [19]. In a network configuration with several VLF/LF propagation paths it is possible to sample larger areas, e.g., over Southern Europe [20]. The upper waveguide boundary could be externally driven, e.g., through solar X-ray flares [21], but significant internal drivers can be acoustic waves (AW) and atmospheric gravity waves (AGW) [22].…”
Section: Earth-ionosphere Waveguidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among geophysical anomalies, specific attention has been given to the electromagnetic emissions (very low frequency (VLF), low frequency (LF), and ultralow frequency (ULF)) recorded before earthquakes, with an interesting correlation between seismic activity and disturbances to radiobroadcasts (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,11,15,20,21,23,32,35,42,44,45).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To collect VLF/LF radio signals and study the electromagnetic field variations associated with seismogenic processes, since the 2000s VLF radio networks were established by Japanese researchers (Japanese-Pacific VLF/LF Network) (22) and a European network (5,6) by Japanese, Russian, and Italian teams cooperation. It is worth underling that there are examples of large earthquakes when no radiation has been detected (4,8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%