2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2006.00146.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The infrared jet in Centaurus A: multiwavelength constraints on emission mechanisms and particle acceleration

Abstract: The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com. Copyright Blackwell Publishing DOI : 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2006.00146.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Birkinshaw et al 2007, in preparation). Cen A, for example, shows significant thermal dust emission in the mid-IR, on scales ranging from the unresolved subparsec scale (likely the torus) to much larger scale emission (Whysong & Antonucci 2004;Hardcastle et al 2006;Radomski et al 2007). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Birkinshaw et al 2007, in preparation). Cen A, for example, shows significant thermal dust emission in the mid-IR, on scales ranging from the unresolved subparsec scale (likely the torus) to much larger scale emission (Whysong & Antonucci 2004;Hardcastle et al 2006;Radomski et al 2007). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We model the electron energy spectrum using the model fitted to the radio, mid‐IR and X‐ray data by Hardcastle et al (2006), which is a broken power law in electron energy: the low‐energy electron energy index is 2.06 steepening to 3.88 at high energies, corresponding to the photon index of 2.44 measured by Hardcastle et al (2006) for the middle region of the X‐ray jet. As described above, the normalization and break energy of the electron spectrum are adjusted to keep consistency with the observed radio and X‐ray measurements.…”
Section: Modelling the Jets And Host Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.1), the jet power that can be carried by the known particle population can be estimated. Considering the inner jet, that is the structure out to ∼3 kpc of projected length, where we know the electron distribution reasonably well (see Hardcastle et al 2006), we have a constraint on the bulk flow speed from the proper motion of the inner knots (0.5c, Hardcastle et al 2003), and we are also confident that the magnetic field cannot be much lower than the equipartition value (Hardcastle & Croston 2011). Do we require protons (thermal or relativistic) in order to transport 10 43 erg s −1 , if we make the additional assumption that the jet is not magnetically dominated?…”
Section: Constraints On Energy Density and Magnetic Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approaching (i.e. northern) jet in Cen A has been traced out to a projected length of ∼5 kpc in radio and 4.5 kpc in X-rays, and from the changing properties of the X-ray emission at about 3.7 kpc from the nucleus, Hardcastle et al (2006) have alleged that the approaching jet enters the northern inner lobe at that point. Based on deep Chandra observations, Hardcastle et al (2007) have claimed that the receding jet extends out to ∼2 kpc in projection in X rays, and it also shows up on a similar scale in radio (Tingay et al 1998;Hardcastle et al 2003), albeit only discernible through a few faint knots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%