2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10058-015-0176-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The informational basis of scoring rules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, while there is a by now rich body of literature contrasting Approval Voting with other social choice methods that aggregate dichotomous ballot information, most notably the Plurality Rule 3 , it is fair to say that most voting theorists would avoid taking a stand on whether Approval Voting is superior to the Borda Count or to Alternative Vote 4 . We do not believe that such state of affairs is purely fortuitous: Approval Voting is naturally comparable with rules that aggregate information of parsimonious nature, 1 A comprehensive survey of axiomatic characterizations of approval voting (up to 2010) is to be found in Xu (2010); more recent contributions include Núñez and Valletta (2015), Maniquet and Mongin (2015) and Sato (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, while there is a by now rich body of literature contrasting Approval Voting with other social choice methods that aggregate dichotomous ballot information, most notably the Plurality Rule 3 , it is fair to say that most voting theorists would avoid taking a stand on whether Approval Voting is superior to the Borda Count or to Alternative Vote 4 . We do not believe that such state of affairs is purely fortuitous: Approval Voting is naturally comparable with rules that aggregate information of parsimonious nature, 1 A comprehensive survey of axiomatic characterizations of approval voting (up to 2010) is to be found in Xu (2010); more recent contributions include Núñez and Valletta (2015), Maniquet and Mongin (2015) and Sato (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… A comprehensive survey of axiomatic characterizations of approval voting (up to 2010) is to be found in Xu (2010); more recent contributions include Núñez and Valletta (2015), Maniquet and Mongin (2015), Sato (2019), and Brandl and Peters (2019). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These properties are formally defined in the next section.3Martinez and Moreno (2017) do not uniquely characterize negative voting, but identify it as part of a class of voting rules they refer to as qualified outcomes which satisfy support monotonicity and limited symmetry. See alsoNúñez and Valletta (2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%