1989
DOI: 10.2307/3172602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Information Processing of Coordinated Media Campaigns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
83
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Two recent papers (Neijens and Voorveld 2015;Vandeberg et al 2015) concisely sum up several theoretical explanations for these effects such as encoding variability (Stammerjohan et al 2005;Tavassoli 1998;Unnava and Burnkrant 1991), repetition-variation (Gibson 1996;Schumann, Petty, and Clemons 1990;Stammerjohan et al 2005;Yaveroglu and Donthu 2008), complementarity (Dijkstra 2002), differential attention (MacKenzie 1986;Stammerjohan et al 2005;Unnava and Burnkrant 1991), forward encoding (Dijkstra 2002;Edell and Keller 1989;Voorveld, Neijens, and Smit 2011), and multiple source credibility (Chang and Thorson 2004;Dijkstra 2002;Laroche et al 2013;Voorveld, Neijens, and Smit 2011). A careful study of these explanations shows that they are all based on one underlying explanation of variability; processing information across different types of media causing more variability in the encoding; and retrieval of the information than (repeatedly) processing information within a single medium (Vandeberg et al 2015).…”
Section: Earlier Research On Cross-media Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two recent papers (Neijens and Voorveld 2015;Vandeberg et al 2015) concisely sum up several theoretical explanations for these effects such as encoding variability (Stammerjohan et al 2005;Tavassoli 1998;Unnava and Burnkrant 1991), repetition-variation (Gibson 1996;Schumann, Petty, and Clemons 1990;Stammerjohan et al 2005;Yaveroglu and Donthu 2008), complementarity (Dijkstra 2002), differential attention (MacKenzie 1986;Stammerjohan et al 2005;Unnava and Burnkrant 1991), forward encoding (Dijkstra 2002;Edell and Keller 1989;Voorveld, Neijens, and Smit 2011), and multiple source credibility (Chang and Thorson 2004;Dijkstra 2002;Laroche et al 2013;Voorveld, Neijens, and Smit 2011). A careful study of these explanations shows that they are all based on one underlying explanation of variability; processing information across different types of media causing more variability in the encoding; and retrieval of the information than (repeatedly) processing information within a single medium (Vandeberg et al 2015).…”
Section: Earlier Research On Cross-media Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synergy has been demonstrated within offline media (e.g. Edell and Keller 1989;Raman and Naik 2004), across offline and online media (e.g. Chang and Thorson 2004;Naik and Peters 2009;Reimer, Rutz and Pauwels 2014) and within online media (e.g.…”
Section: Synergy In Online Media and Offline Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another explanation is forward encoding. When consumers are exposed to multiple media in a campaign, the first medium stimulates forward encoding, by 'priming' the consumer's interest for and attention to an ad in the second medium Edell & Keller, 1989, 1999Dijkstra, 2002). In other words, exposure to an ad one medium primes interest for the ad in a subsequent but different medium.…”
Section: Study 2 Synergy Between Sns and Traditional Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%