2013
DOI: 10.1080/10573569.2013.789783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Informal Reading-Thinking Inventory: Twenty-First-Century Assessment Formats for Discovering Reading and Writing Needs—and Strengths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leaman and Flanagan (2013) believed that having impromptu activities such as role play followed by reflection-in-action will encourage various levels of critical thinking skills as these activities involve specific thinking activities among students such as analyzing, reasoning and synthesizing information before conducting discussions about their role play experience. Other teaching and learning activities that promote reasoning and verifying evidence would be problem-based learning and collaborative activities (Erduran & Msimanga, 2014) as well as prompting and questioning (King et al, 2012;Manzo & Manzo, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaman and Flanagan (2013) believed that having impromptu activities such as role play followed by reflection-in-action will encourage various levels of critical thinking skills as these activities involve specific thinking activities among students such as analyzing, reasoning and synthesizing information before conducting discussions about their role play experience. Other teaching and learning activities that promote reasoning and verifying evidence would be problem-based learning and collaborative activities (Erduran & Msimanga, 2014) as well as prompting and questioning (King et al, 2012;Manzo & Manzo, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the difficulties of using introspection with children of this age a series of direct questions were compiled to gain insight into the metacognitive skills of the child and her/his understanding of the demands in each task, together with her/his abilities and manner of execution. This format has been used frequently in educational research on reading comprehension tasks and mathematical problem solving (Desoete, Roeyers, & Buysse, 2001; Manzo, Manzo, & McKenna, 1995). The questionnaire is composed of 10 questions which are directed to the child while he or she performs the ACFS classification task (pretest); the assessor assigns a score (1 or 0) for each item based on the child’s response, for a maximum score of 10 points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While efforts have been made to include aspects of higher order thinking in reading inventories (Manzo, 1995; Manzo & Manzo, 2013), and reform efforts like the CCSS emphasize the importance of close reading, assessing interpretive reasoning still appears to be a significant challenge (Lee & Goldman, 2015). One of the fundamental issues is that literary analysis is built around what Pressley and Afflerbach (1995) termed constructively responsive reading strategies —effortful, focused strategies that are mobilized and combined by the reader in response to specific reading goals (Afflerbach & Cho, 2008).…”
Section: Strategies For Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%