The Influences of Subordinate Personalities and Job Characteristics on the Relationship Between Leader Behavior and Subordinate Morale

Matsubara, Toshihiro

doi:10.2130/jjesp.24.55

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There is also support for congruence on prototypes as a predictor of cooperation. Research has also shown that perceptions of the characteristics exhibited by both leaders and followers influence the behavior of by members of the dyad (Carsten et al, 2010; Engle & Lord, 1997; Lord et al, 1984; Lord & Maher, 1991; Matsubara, 1984; Shondrick & Lord, 2010). An experiment carried out by De Cremer (2006) demonstrated that characteristics exhibited by leaders (charisma, self-sacrifice) affects the motivation of others with regard to cooperation.…”

Section: Cooperation In Dyadic Relationshipsmentioning

confidence: 99%

If You’re Not With Me You’re . . . ? Examining Prototypes and Cooperation in Leader–Follower Relationships

Coyle

Foti

2014

Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigated how congruence between dyadic partners' leader and follower prototypes affects leader-member exchange (LMX) quality. Specifically, we examined cooperation as a process variable in the dyadic relationship. Participants in a laboratory setting completed a group task followed by dyadic task in the context of a leader-follower relationship. Observed cooperation mediated the relationship between congruence on leader prototypes and leader assessed LMX quality, and the relationship between congruence on leader prototypes and LMX agreement. As congruence on leader prototypes decreased, leaders were less likely to be cooperative in an exchange relationship. As congruence on follower prototypes decreased, there was a greater chance leaders would cooperate but followers would defect.

show abstract