Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2017
DOI: 10.4067/s0717-97072017000100012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influences of Poplar Inner and Outer Bark Content on Mechanical Properties of Wood/Polypropylene Composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flexural properties of decayed-wood powder were lower than those of normal wood powder, but the flexural properties of wood powder were better when the dosage of wood powder was 40% and 50%. Hosseinihashemi et al [ 51 ] evaluated the individual and interaction effects of poplar endothelial powder (IBF), bark powder (OBF), and wood meal (WF), and the effect of WF content on the mechanical properties of WPCs. The results showed that WF supplementation significantly increased the bending strength, bending modulus, and tensile strength ( p < 0.05) of WPC.…”
Section: Influence Of the Raw Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flexural properties of decayed-wood powder were lower than those of normal wood powder, but the flexural properties of wood powder were better when the dosage of wood powder was 40% and 50%. Hosseinihashemi et al [ 51 ] evaluated the individual and interaction effects of poplar endothelial powder (IBF), bark powder (OBF), and wood meal (WF), and the effect of WF content on the mechanical properties of WPCs. The results showed that WF supplementation significantly increased the bending strength, bending modulus, and tensile strength ( p < 0.05) of WPC.…”
Section: Influence Of the Raw Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medium-density particleboard with 15% UF resin; single-layer; thickness of 10 mm; Galam bark pieces 6 cm in length 4 Bark board without synthetic adhesive; single-layer; thickness of 6.25 mm; particles passed through 4 mesh size (+) Target density Based on SNI standard 03-2105-2006 (2006), the MoR, MoE, and TSPtPS values of the BBP manufactured in this study did not meet the minimum requirements for Type-8 (a MoR of 82 kg/cm 2 , a MoE of 20400 kg/cm 2 , and a TSPtPS of 1.5 kg/cm 2 ). Nonetheless, it can be said that the low mechanical properties of the board panel made without adhesives are due to the low strength of the bark, i.e., the fibers of the bark are shorter and weaker than wood fibers, and the proportion of its fibers is lower than wood (Geng et al 2006;Gao et al 2011;Hosseinihashemi et al 2017).…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%