2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2010.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influences of oxygen ion implantation on the structural and electrical properties of B-doped diamond films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In both samples resistance change rate was proportional to µ 2 B 2 at low field and coincidence with other result as reported in [5]. It indicates also that the defects produced by higher doses ion implantation give contributions to the conductivity in diamond film as reported in [10]. Such kind of phenomenon could explain by a localization of the wave function on B-atoms as reported by Willems et al [12].…”
Section: Magnetoresistance Propertiessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In both samples resistance change rate was proportional to µ 2 B 2 at low field and coincidence with other result as reported in [5]. It indicates also that the defects produced by higher doses ion implantation give contributions to the conductivity in diamond film as reported in [10]. Such kind of phenomenon could explain by a localization of the wave function on B-atoms as reported by Willems et al [12].…”
Section: Magnetoresistance Propertiessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The Magnetoresistance ratio and curve profile of the samples is clearly depending on the roughness of the film surface and the oxygen concentration at the interface, while it increases from +45% to +80% for B-E1D1 (Fe+B ions) and A-E3D1 (NiFe+B ions) samples respectively. Generally it is found higher oxygen content on the CVD diamond film contributes to conductivity as reported by Hu et al [17] . In this case, the oxygen concentration at the interface between diamond film and Si substrate causes higher the resistance value and gives lower magnetoresistance ratio as found in sample B-E1D1.…”
Section: Magnetoresistance Propertiessupporting
confidence: 52%
“…This variation, also reported in refs. , is usually attributed to the increase of damage density in the diamond layer. After annealing, all the samples have a resistivity close to the graphite resistivity (around 250 Ω sq −1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%