The Influence of X-Factor (Trunk Rotation) and Experience on the Quality of the Badminton Forehand Smash

Abstract

No existing studies of badminton technique have used full-body biomechanical modeling based on three-dimensional (3D) motion capture to quantify the kinematics of the sport. The purposes of the current study were to: 1) quantitatively describe kinematic characteristics of the forehand smash using a 15-segment, full-body biomechanical model, 2) examine and compare kinematic differences between novice and skilled players with a focus on trunk rotation (the X-factor), and 3) through this comparison, identify principal parameters that contributed to the quality of the skill. Together, these findings have the potential to assist coaches and players in the teaching and learning of the forehand smash. Twenty-four participants were divided into two groups (novice, n = 10 and skilled, n = 14). A 10-camera VICON MX40 motion capture system (200 frames/s) was used to quantify full-body kinematics, racket movement and the flight of the shuttlecock. Results confirmed that skilled players utilized more trunk rotation than novices. In two ways, trunk rotation (the X-factor) was shown to be vital for maximizing the release speed of the shuttlecock – an important measure of the quality of the forehand smash. First, more trunk rotation invoked greater lengthening in the pectoralis major (PM) during the preparation phase of the stroke which helped generate an explosive muscle contraction. Second, larger range of motion (ROM) induced by trunk rotation facilitated a whip-like (proximal to distal) control sequence among the body segments responsible for increasing racket speed. These results suggest that training intended to increase the efficacy of this skill needs to focus on how the X-factor is incorporated into the kinematic chain of the arm and the racket.

Hammer Throw: A Pilot Study for a Novel Digital-Route for Diagnosing and Improving Its Throw Quality

“…Raw kinematic data was processed using a five-point (1-3-5-3-1 function) smoothing filter. From these 39 markers, a full body biomechanical model with 15 segments was built to reveal undisclosed aspects of the motor control [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The model worked as follows: from motion capture, we could establish anatomical positions, which then allowed the construction of a 15-segment full-body model.…”

Challenges and Future of Wearable Technology in Human Motor-Skill Learning and Optimization

“…For establishing the model, about 40 body-surface markers are needed to supply 3D coordinate inputs for mechanically determining joint kinematics in order to reveal the motor-control/limbs' coordination. The model is widely applied in the current 3D motion capture technologies for demystifying and optimizing complex motor skills in sports and arts performance [4,15,17,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. This video-based technology uses multi-cameras to track ~40 reflective markers (their weights are negligible) attached on the body surface.…”

Improving Students` Badminton Smash Skill Through Game Modifications

“…According to Zhao Zhang the overhead smash is commonly divided into three phases for analytic and instructional purposes: preparation, acceleration and follow through [6].…”