2018
DOI: 10.1556/2054.2018.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of therapists’ first-hand experience with psychedelics on psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy research and therapist training

Abstract: Clinical research on psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy is rapidly advancing in the USA, with two drugs, psilocybin and MDMA, progressing through a structure of FDA-approved trials on a trajectory toward Drug Enforcement Agency rescheduling for therapeutic use. Researcher's and clinician's personal use of psychedelics was cited as a potential confound in psychedelic research studies conducted in the 1950s and 1960s, a concern which contributed to the cessation of this research for some 20 years. Currently, the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability to gauge the individual patient's distress tolerance on a moment-tomoment basis and strike a sensible balance between encouraging acceptance and supporting avoidance can be considered a key requirement for psychedelic therapists, and should be trained accordingly. It can be argued that such perspective-taking requires first-hand experience with psychedelic states [see (104) for a discussion of this matter].…”
Section: Direct Implications Of the Model For Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to gauge the individual patient's distress tolerance on a moment-tomoment basis and strike a sensible balance between encouraging acceptance and supporting avoidance can be considered a key requirement for psychedelic therapists, and should be trained accordingly. It can be argued that such perspective-taking requires first-hand experience with psychedelic states [see (104) for a discussion of this matter].…”
Section: Direct Implications Of the Model For Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another salient question in the field of psychedelic therapy training is the need for, or relevance, of a therapist's personal experience of the study drug. Some advocate for the inclusion of such experiences in training programs (23), and others have cautioned that the decision to have and discuss such experiences requires careful forethought by clinicians (31). No research has yet demonstrated the impact of therapists' training, or other kinds of personal experience, with psychedelics on clinical outcomes, and the inclusion of such experiences may be a barrier to the inclusion of a diverse group of therapists, place trainers and trainees in dual roles, and even stigmatize those who choose to pursue psychedelic-assisted therapy as a professional.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Forstmann and Sagioglou (2021) found that the perception of a reserachers' integrity and quality of their research by psychedelic naïve participants was reduced if the researcher self-admitted substance use (Forstmann and Sagioglou, 2021). While there will likely be a continuum amongst therapists engaged in SAPT clinical trails, ranging from those without any personal experiences to those with a vast amount of experience across substances and settings, open discussion of these experiences can be constrained for fear of personal, professional, and sometimes legal consequences (Nielson and Guss, 2018;Ross et al, 2020). Some practitioners in the field regard personal experiences with these substances as essential in order to emphasize with the client's experiences (Metzner, 1998;Bogenschutz, 2013;Bogenschutz and Forcehimes, 2017) and in certain countries, such as Switzerland, personal experience is required for therapists to work with clients in SAPT settings (Grof, 2000;Strassman, 2001).…”
Section: Ethical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, personal experiences may lead some therapists to become less curious about the client if they believe that their clients' experience will be similar to their own (Bogenschutz, 2013;Bogenschutz and Forcehimes, 2017). Thus, personal experience is a double edged sword that may be a potential confound to research and SAPT, though has not yet been empirically investigated (Nielson and Guss, 2018). Also, in line with standard ethical guidelines, we believe that therapists should not take any mind-altering substances before or during therapy sessions, regardless of whether they are providing SAPT or regular psychotherapy.…”
Section: Ethical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%