2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.03.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of the Organ Allocation Policy on a Patient's Chances of Undergoing Heart Transplantation and the Posttransplantation Survival Rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, they have changed the donation process from an opt-in regulation to an opt-out regulation (presumed consent). The purpose was to increase donation rates, protect the rights of the donors, provide efficient allocation of the organs, and improve the quality and safety of transplants [5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As such, they have changed the donation process from an opt-in regulation to an opt-out regulation (presumed consent). The purpose was to increase donation rates, protect the rights of the donors, provide efficient allocation of the organs, and improve the quality and safety of transplants [5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, in countries such as Canada where the donation process uses an opt-in system [10], the main strategies to increase organ and tissue donation are based either on the development of organ procurement organization (OPO) coordinators in clinical settings [11] or on the implementation of new regulations and health policies [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current data suggest that regional disparities exist in waiting times for heart transplantation in America, 12,13 Europe, 14,15 and Asia. 16,17 Such disparities, among others, could lead to differences in device utilization and indications for implantation among the regions. As geographic variation in indications, regulatory environments, and/or management protocols could lead to different outcomes, identification of these regional differences offers an opportunity to optimize global use of LVADs, generate new knowledge that may be shared across regions, and establish best practices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%