1975
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1975.tb01127.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of the nitrogen status of oat plants (Avena sativa L.) on the interception and retention of foliar sprays

Abstract: Resum6: ZusammenfassungYoung oat plants grown at a high soil nitrogen level retained more spray tban plants grown at a lower nitrogen level. The greater retention by tbe bigb nitrogen plants appeared to be due both to tbeir greater leaf area and to tbe less vertical angle of tbe leaves.The angles of contact of water droplets on the leaf surfaees were lower for high nitrogen plants. Therefore water droplets hitting tbe surface of the leaves of these plants would be less likely to be reflected and would spread o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
(6 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were obtained in several previous studies (13,23). Contradictory results exist but those retention data are based only on plant biomass or TLA (2,6,11,14,19), and are unable to adequately distinguish the effect of leaf orientation on spray interception from the effect on herbicide retention. "Optimum" = 20/15 C, full light with daily watering; low temperature = "optimum" conditions except temperature was decreased from 20/15 C to 10/5 C for 7 d immediately before spraying; high temperature = "optimum" conditions except temperature was 30/20 C; drought = "optimum" conditions except water was withheld for 6 d immediately before spraying; shading = "optimum" conditions except plants were grown under 70% shading.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Similar results were obtained in several previous studies (13,23). Contradictory results exist but those retention data are based only on plant biomass or TLA (2,6,11,14,19), and are unable to adequately distinguish the effect of leaf orientation on spray interception from the effect on herbicide retention. "Optimum" = 20/15 C, full light with daily watering; low temperature = "optimum" conditions except temperature was decreased from 20/15 C to 10/5 C for 7 d immediately before spraying; high temperature = "optimum" conditions except temperature was 30/20 C; drought = "optimum" conditions except water was withheld for 6 d immediately before spraying; shading = "optimum" conditions except plants were grown under 70% shading.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%