1959
DOI: 10.1021/j150572a034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of the Net Protein Charge on the Rate of Formation of Enzyme–Substrate Complexes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

1960
1960
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(7 reference statements)
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although high, such a value is quite possible in view of the investigation by Alberty & Hammes (1958) of the rate at which a diffusion-controlled reaction can take place with a specific site freely accessible from all points in a hemisphere. The effect of decreasing the salt concentration on the ratio k2/k1 (Table 3) is also in the direction to be expected from the later investigation of Hammes & Alberty (1959) of electrostatic effects in such reactions. Similarly, the effect of 60 % sucrose on the reaction may be explained by supposing that k, is much reduced by the increase in viscosity.…”
Section: Compari8on Of Theory and Experimentssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Although high, such a value is quite possible in view of the investigation by Alberty & Hammes (1958) of the rate at which a diffusion-controlled reaction can take place with a specific site freely accessible from all points in a hemisphere. The effect of decreasing the salt concentration on the ratio k2/k1 (Table 3) is also in the direction to be expected from the later investigation of Hammes & Alberty (1959) of electrostatic effects in such reactions. Similarly, the effect of 60 % sucrose on the reaction may be explained by supposing that k, is much reduced by the increase in viscosity.…”
Section: Compari8on Of Theory and Experimentssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…For both N-SOD and PEG-SOD the trends of k versus I appear to be in agreement with the ones predicted by Alberty and Hammes (Alberty and Hammes, 1958;Hammes and Alberty, 1959;Argese et al, 1987).…”
Section: Results and Discussion Comparison Between Kinetic Behaviourssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…(We choose to definef (r, t ro) so as to incorporate the angular factors of 27r[s = 2] and 4w(s = 3).) We shall assume that the radial propagator satisfies the Smoluchowski mean-field diffusion equation (7) -f(r, tIro) = r-' rs-rI D(r) [d + "'(r)'f(r, t'Iro) (4) at Olr [Or~r) 4…”
Section: Spb Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such work is crucial to the understanding of diffusion-controlled chemical kinetics and transport of ionic species in an immense variety of systems. In dealing with these problems, previous authors have either resorted to linear approximations and numerical solutions (3,4) or simply neglected many-body effects (screening) altogether (5,6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%