2001
DOI: 10.1002/1521-4117(200112)18:5/6<278::aid-ppsc278>3.0.co;2-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of the Magnetic Field on the Zeta Potential of Precipitated Calcium Carbonate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gradual collapse of ζ-potential and its increase to +20 mV after 10 min in hard waters when the temperature has increased to 40 °C suggests that the sheathed nanobubbles become unstable, tending to coagulate and disperse or collapse, leaving behind extended particles of amorphous calcium carbonate, the precursor of aragonite. The positive ζ-potential coincident with the onset of precipitation of aragonite is consistent with previous work, although the ζ-potential of well-crystallized calcium carbonate is usually negative. , …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The gradual collapse of ζ-potential and its increase to +20 mV after 10 min in hard waters when the temperature has increased to 40 °C suggests that the sheathed nanobubbles become unstable, tending to coagulate and disperse or collapse, leaving behind extended particles of amorphous calcium carbonate, the precursor of aragonite. The positive ζ-potential coincident with the onset of precipitation of aragonite is consistent with previous work, although the ζ-potential of well-crystallized calcium carbonate is usually negative. , …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…water and growth media. It is well established that magnetic fields affect various physical properties of solutes, such as formation of calcium carbonate (Strazisar et al 2001), water vaporisation , ion hydration and resin absorption (Baran and Degtyarev 2001). Usually, these effects are achieved with very strong magnetic fields in the milliTesla to Tesla range; for that reason these results may be pertinent for experiments done at high magnetic flux densities.…”
Section: Magnetic Effects On Solutesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 was based on operating conditions for proper magnetic water treatment suggested by Strazisar et al (2001): the fluid flow was orthogonal with respect to magnetic field direction; magnetic field strength was at least 0.5-1 Tesla; there was a long residence time; and the water flow was in turbulent region.…”
Section: Mft System Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common chemical methods used to reduce water scaling, including the addition of lime or ion exchange systems, are not costeffective, change the water chemistry, and can even cause harmful health effects. Therefore, researchers viewed MFT as a potential alternative to these methods because MFT is a physical treatment that should not alter the water chemistry and is more cost-effective because of low maintenance and low capital investment to install MFT systems (Lipus and Dobersek, 2007) Reported claims for exposing water to a magnetic field include lower scale formation rate, development of soft scale formations, change in size of precipitated particles, and no significant effects (Strazisar et al 2001). Regardless of varied results from MFT studies and a lack of a proven mechanism to describe how MFT alters water chemistry, MFT has the potential to be a useful physical treatment for the removal of minerals (Busch and Busch 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%