2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11284-016-1395-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of the landscape structure within buffer zones, catchment land use and instream environmental variables on mollusc communities in a medium‐sized lowland river

Abstract: The world's freshwater molluscan fauna is facing unprecedented threats from habitat loss and degradation. Declines in native populations are mostly attributed to the human impact, which results in reduced water quality. The objectives of our survey were to analyse the structure of the mollusc communities in a medium-sized lowland river and to determine the most important environmental variables at different spatial scales, including landscape structure, catchment land use and instream environmental factors tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(43 reference statements)
2
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In each of the analysed streams, bivalvia, Pisidium , were also abundant on flowing sections. Rapid water flow prevents the accumulation of fine‐grain sediment and aerates the spaces between grains of such substrates better, providing favourable conditions (Zawal et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each of the analysed streams, bivalvia, Pisidium , were also abundant on flowing sections. Rapid water flow prevents the accumulation of fine‐grain sediment and aerates the spaces between grains of such substrates better, providing favourable conditions (Zawal et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In opposition to this, there are the springs from the locality of Z1, where there was only a small water bodies element, resulting from the dominant influence of flood waters. Crenobiontic fauna have a much less significant dispersal ability than rheobiontic fauna and therefore the damaged fauna is reborn much more slowly even the same environmental conditions ( Szlauer-Łukaszewska & Zawal, 2014 ; Stępień et al., 2015 ; Zawal et al, 2015 ; Zawal et al, 2016a ; Zawal et al, 2016b ; Zawal et al, 2016c ; Zawal et al, 2017 ; Dąbkowski et al., 2016 ; Płaska et al., 2016 ; Buczyński et al, 2016 ; Pakulnicka et al, 2016a ; Pakulnicka et al, 2016b ; Buczyńska et al., 2017 ; Gerecke, Martin & Gledhill, 2017 ). We did not find any rhitrobiontic species in flooded springs: these were dominated by lenitobionts and to a lesser extent by crenobionts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies of the Krąpiel valley showed environmental factors to be acting at different levels of organization in the environment, i.e., (1) the landscape level, (2) the macrohabitat level and (3) the mesohabitat level; they all affect the species composition and the abundance of water mite assemblages ( Stryjecki et al, 2016 ; Buczyńska et al., 2017 ; Zawal et al, 2016b ; Zawal et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aquatic communities in the urban environment are affected by an additional increase in water temperature due to decreased canopy cover (Somers et al 2013). Such influence of increasing insolation and temperature has been demonstrated for some species of water mites, mollusks, and ostracods in the Krąpiel River especially in lentic habitats (Stryjecki et al 2016;Zawal et al 2016c, Szlauer-Łukaszewska and Pešić 2020.…”
Section: Environmental Difference Between Rural and Urban Samplesmentioning
confidence: 98%