2016
DOI: 10.1177/0265813516641685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of the impedance function on gravity-based pedestrian accessibility measures: A comparative analysis

Abstract: Pedestrian accessibility has been growing in importance as an urban planning objective. Assessing it with gravity-based or potential accessibility measures requires the selection of an impedance function in order to reflect the friction of distance. The choice of impedance function is crucial to pedestrian accessibility assessment due to the level of spatial data detail required and also because perceived distances differ from physical distances. Here, we measure and compare 20 gravity-based measures, varying … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to Kwan (Kwan 1998) and Vale & Pereira (Vale and Pereira 2017), correlations in accessibility across measures are generally strong (Figure 3), indicating many capture similar spatial processes. For example, of those used in Figures 1 and 2, results from the negative exponential (EXP0_15), modified Gaussian (MGAUS180), cumulative rectangular (CUMR40), and cumulative linear (CUML40) measures of impedance all show correlation coefficients of at least 0.87.…”
Section: Transport Findingsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Similar to Kwan (Kwan 1998) and Vale & Pereira (Vale and Pereira 2017), correlations in accessibility across measures are generally strong (Figure 3), indicating many capture similar spatial processes. For example, of those used in Figures 1 and 2, results from the negative exponential (EXP0_15), modified Gaussian (MGAUS180), cumulative rectangular (CUMR40), and cumulative linear (CUML40) measures of impedance all show correlation coefficients of at least 0.87.…”
Section: Transport Findingsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…where i is a population center (i = 1,2,...I), I is the total number of the population centers, A si is the accessibility from the ith population center to the nearest RCF after optimization, a is the weighted average accessibility, V is the total number of beds of all RCFs, w i is the demands of the ith population center, namely the number of the elderly who need the service of RCFs, W is the total demands of all population centers. The commonly-used improved gravity-based method is used to calculate the accessibility as follows [28]:…”
Section: Maximizing Equitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A research question also remains: what is the best function of distance in gravity or potential models? In research to date, a cumulative Gaussian function has been considered as having the best fit for walking (Vale and Pereira, 2017).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%