1978
DOI: 10.1080/00071667808416475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of the conventional microflora on the body temperature of the chick

Abstract: 1. Deep body temperature was measured daily in germ-free and conventional chicks from 1 to 16 of age. 2. The temperature of germ-free chicks rose rapidly during the first 4 d and thereafter only slowly, whereas that of conventional birds increased gradually throughout. 3. Body temperature attained by the germ-free birds was about 0.3 degrees C higher than that of conventional birds.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the fasting state, heat production, calculated as energy loss from the carcass, was lower in the CV birds than in their GF counterparts as indicated by changes in the intercepts of the regression lines on ME intake levels. This confirmed our previous findings of lower fasting heat production (Muramatsu et al 1988a), and was in line with the lower body temperature in the CV chickens (Harrison & Hewitt, 1978;Muramatsu et al 1988~). It follows, therefore, that the presence of the gut microflora may benefit the host birds by saving energy loss from the body when no dietary energy supply is available.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the fasting state, heat production, calculated as energy loss from the carcass, was lower in the CV birds than in their GF counterparts as indicated by changes in the intercepts of the regression lines on ME intake levels. This confirmed our previous findings of lower fasting heat production (Muramatsu et al 1988a), and was in line with the lower body temperature in the CV chickens (Harrison & Hewitt, 1978;Muramatsu et al 1988~). It follows, therefore, that the presence of the gut microflora may benefit the host birds by saving energy loss from the body when no dietary energy supply is available.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This change has been explained by an accumulation of substances normally degraded by the microbiome and histological changes of the cecum epithelial cells [ 13 ]. In germfree chicks, the body temperature is slightly higher than that of chicks with normal flora [ 14 ]. These experiments have demonstrated the complex role that microbiomes play in host development, not only in the gastrointestinal systems but in other organs as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change has been explained by an accumulation of substances normally degraded by the microbiome (Ishikawa et al, 1989). In germfree chicks, a change in the normal body temperature was noted which was slightly higher than that of chicks with normal microflora (Harrison and Hewitt, 1978).…”
Section: Gut Microbiome and Host Digestive Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%