The influence of the Belt and Road Initiative in Europe

Abstract

This paper contributes to the growing body of literature aimed at understanding the wide-ranging implications of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) by displaying the variety of contractual, formal and informal arrangements that China has entered with European states on a bilateral basis. Almost all European states have entered into one or another form of formal cooperation under the disguise of the BRI. In general, Eastern European states tend to have the highest degree of formal cooperation as official BRI members, whereas the picture is more diverse in the NorthWest of Europe. Cooperation ranges from investment-based infrastructure projects to joint financial investments, as well as projects in education or health. This complicated puzzle of arrangements ultimately favours China's influence and will change Europe's interconnectedness with China beyond transport connectivity.

EU Cohesion Policy and European spatial governance: an introduction to territorial, economic and social challenges

“…Looking through a spatial lens, the increase of international foreign direct investments in critical infrastructure is one major aspect of this. Take, for example, Chinese investments through the Belt and Road Initiative, launched in 2013 (Maçães, 2018;Sielker and Kaufmann, 2020): For the EU Danube Region countries, Chinese infrastructure funding comes with little administrative burden, in contrast to funding from the Connecting Europe Facility in the framework of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) corridors. The pursuit of a new north-south corridor through Eastern Europe is robustly supported by China.…”

The impact of China’s Belt and Road Initiative on the Western Balkan Region: An erosion of EU conditionality?

“…With this aim in mind, in 2013 it launched the so-called Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), aiming at promoting economic connectivity between China and the countries involved in the initiative. 5 Importantly, the BRI should not be regarded as a single megaproject, rather as a continuously growing initiative with a large portfolio of projects for rail, road, sea, and airport infrastructure, power and water links, real estate contracts, and, more recently, digital infrastructure (Sielker and Kaufmann, 2020). In this sense, it is seen as the most ambitious and economically relevant initiative ever undertaken, comparable only with the Marshal Plan launched by the United States after the Second World War.…”

“…Despite the launch of the EU-China Strategy 2020, the EU has not yet managed to unite its member and candidate countries on a common position and the latter engage with China through a plethora of bilateral relationships. 8 This contributes to reinforce the Chinese influence in Europe beyond individual projects and geopolitical debates, especially in these Central and South Eastern European Countries that constitute the BRI's main entry points (Maçães, 2018;Sielker and Kaufmann, 2020).…”

Editorial: The geography and governance of infrastructure provision

“…Besides the relevance of EU and national actors, infrastructure provision increasingly became a sphere of political action for global players. China, for example, is heavily investing into big infrastructural projects in European and Asian countries in recent years through its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) (Rogelja, 2020;Sielker & Kaufmann, 2020). The BRI is dedicated to fulfilling China's vision of becoming a greater leader on a global scale.…”