1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf02275906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of surface treatments on the electroosmotic flow in micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(21 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experiments, cathodic EOF has also been observed in the microchannels composed of native PDMS substrates, which is in agreement with the data of other authors [31,32]. The possible sources of the negative surface charge of native PDMS has recently been discussed [31].…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our experiments, cathodic EOF has also been observed in the microchannels composed of native PDMS substrates, which is in agreement with the data of other authors [31,32]. The possible sources of the negative surface charge of native PDMS has recently been discussed [31].…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…These experiments indicate the negative zeta-potentials for all the systems studied. Cathodic EOF was also reported by another group [32]. The inconsistency of the data was explained by the differences in the PDMS formulations used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Consequently, it seems unlikely that many buffer ions, which tend to be weakly adsorbing, could act as a PDI and control the surface potential. However, the fact that SDS changes the EOF of PDMS, but not glass at pH 9 [28,35], indicates the tendency of hydrophobic compounds to adsorb on PDMS. The similarity of m EOF measured at 1 mM SDS at both pH 3 and 9 is in agreement with observations in polypropylene capillaries with SDS present [36], indicating adsorption of SDS regardless of the surface charge on the polymer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The results can be seen in Figure 3 and Table 111. The decrease in EOF velocity due to the greater viscosity of the mobile phase and to the decrease in voltage led to an increase in solute retention time and, consequently, in the time of analysis [25]. After an.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Influence Of Buffer Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the overall net charge of each solute primarily affects its mobility in CE, pH has a significant influence on retention The mobility of each solute increases at high pH; thus in MECC the effective mobility toward the cathode decreases and elution times become longer. Moreover, the degree of dissociation of the capillary surface silanols (the main source generating the zeta-potential) depends strongly on the pH of the buffer solution [25]. We previously demonstrated this influence on the resolution of the nucleotide-3'-monophosphates; at pH 7, we were able to separate the nucleotide-5'-monophosphates, but not the 3'-monophosphates.…”
Section: Influence Of Buffer Compositionmentioning
confidence: 94%