2017
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/175/1/012053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Surface Roughness on Biocompatibility and Fatigue Life of Titanium Based Alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, such an oxide film reduces the dissolution rate of the metal by acting as a physical barrier limiting the transport of electrons, cations and anions between the metal and the electrolyte, and reducing the kinetics of the anodic and cathodic reactions underlying the corrosion process. On the other hand, the deposition of oxide or nitride particles could induce the adherence of tissue to the rough surface of implant, as depicted in Figure 6 [ 78 ]. The thickness of the passive film on alloys and its composition changes with potential [ 77 ].…”
Section: Biological Compatibility and Corrosiveness Of Implantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the one hand, such an oxide film reduces the dissolution rate of the metal by acting as a physical barrier limiting the transport of electrons, cations and anions between the metal and the electrolyte, and reducing the kinetics of the anodic and cathodic reactions underlying the corrosion process. On the other hand, the deposition of oxide or nitride particles could induce the adherence of tissue to the rough surface of implant, as depicted in Figure 6 [ 78 ]. The thickness of the passive film on alloys and its composition changes with potential [ 77 ].…”
Section: Biological Compatibility and Corrosiveness Of Implantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Granular surface: ( a ) Geometry of granules—The region of melted and transformed material is marked dashed line; ( b ) granules displacement on the surface (according to [ 78 ]). …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smoothness of specimens in control group G (Ra~1.27 nm) greatly exceeded that of the treatment groups. Note that surface roughness can be used to enhance adhesion between the implant surface and tissue [ 31 ]. One previous study on cellulose dialysis membranes reported that rougher surfaces (Ra~50–100 nm) are more amenable to platelet adhesion than are smooth surfaces (Ra~10 nm) [ 32 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roughness is without a doubt one of the main aspects to mind since the implant's texture highly influences the tissue response [38]. In the past, smooth dental implant surfaces were desired [39], however, with the current awareness that completely smooth surfaces do not allow tissue adhesion, possibly leading to body fluid accumulation and inflammation [40], the prevailing trend points towards the use of moderately rough implant surfaces [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%