1995
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199509000-00015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of surface-blasting on the incorporation of titanium-alloy implants in a rabbit intramedullary model.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
105
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
8
105
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Korovessis et al [18] have shown that the proximal bone mineral density measured immediately after operation around Zweymu Èller-AlloclassicÒ-SL stem remained unchanged after 4 years. Retrieval studies by Lintner et al [20] have shown excellent biological fixation of pressfit grit-blasted titanium endoprostheses and this has been confirmed experimentally by Feighan et al [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Korovessis et al [18] have shown that the proximal bone mineral density measured immediately after operation around Zweymu Èller-AlloclassicÒ-SL stem remained unchanged after 4 years. Retrieval studies by Lintner et al [20] have shown excellent biological fixation of pressfit grit-blasted titanium endoprostheses and this has been confirmed experimentally by Feighan et al [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This stem was designed to provide reliable metaphyseal ingrowth by press-fit fixation of 0.5 mm [1] and to limit distal osteolysis with its circumferential proximal porous fibre metal. The corundumised surface finish of the midstem was designed to promote secure bone implant interface [2]. In addition, the trapezoidal cross-section was designed to improve proximal fill and rotational stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many previous studies have compared the influence of the surface geometry of materials on cell behavior and the characteristics of dental implants using in vivo and/or in vitro model systems to simulate the implant surface in situ 2,4,5,13,14,16,17,19,31) . The characteristics of the surface geometry influence cell attachment, orientation, and subsequent tissue integration in vivo 10,11,13,14,[32][33][34][35] . Much information on the interactions between cells and materials has been gained from in vitro studies using various approaches to examine the influence of surface characteristics on cell behavior; such research helps in understanding events that occur in vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%