2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of substrate stiffness gradients on primary human dermal fibroblasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
63
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The physical cues include gradient stiffness of substrates, gradient pore size and gradient pH value etc. Those cues demonstrated profound influence on cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation [5][6][7][8]. For instance, Jorge et al constructed polyelectrolyte multilayer (PEM) with gradient stiffness by using layer-by-layer assembly technique, which guided the cell adhesion and spreading [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical cues include gradient stiffness of substrates, gradient pore size and gradient pH value etc. Those cues demonstrated profound influence on cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation [5][6][7][8]. For instance, Jorge et al constructed polyelectrolyte multilayer (PEM) with gradient stiffness by using layer-by-layer assembly technique, which guided the cell adhesion and spreading [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, diverse techniques have been utilized for the systematic study of the effects of a substrate's stiffness gradient on cell behaviors. They include diffusion [21], controlled dipping into crosslinking solution [22], microfluidics/photopolymerization [23], gradient mask/photopolymerization [24], convection-alternating flow/photopolymerization [25], photopolymerization using a gradually darkening mask [26], photopolymerization using a sliding mask [16,27], temperature gradients during crosslinking [28], and controlling the height of the substrate [29]. However, the toxicity from residual monomers, precursors, photoinitiators, and crosslinkers [30e33]; different surface chemistry from different densities of crosslinkers along the gradient [22]; relatively narrow ranges of stiffness gradient [29]; and the complexity of fabrication processes are also considered as potential limitations of conventional systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dermal fibroblast size can be manipulated in vitro by culture on substrates of varying stiffness (Grinnell & Petroll, 2010; Janmey & Miller, 2011; Hopp et al ., 2013; Buxboim et al ., 2014). Fibroblasts achieve greater size on stiff substrates, compared to more compliant substrates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%