2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-010-0072-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Strain Rate Dependency on the Structure–Property Relations of Porcine Brain

Abstract: This study examines the internal microstructure evolution of porcine brain during mechanical deformation. Strain rate dependency of porcine brain was investigated under quasi-static compression for strain rates of 0.00625, 0.025, and 0.10 s(-1). Confocal microscopy was employed at 15, 30, and 40% strain to quantify microstructural changes, and image analysis was implemented to calculate the area fraction of neurons and glial cells. The nonlinear stress-strain behavior exhibited a viscoelastic response from the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in this initial effort, the force in tension showed strain softening, which was not consistent with the experimental response documented by Jin et al (2013), which shows stiffening for strains higher than around 0.2. These results suggest that the mechanical response of the brain cannot be adequately simulated with one term in the hyperelastic energy functions, similar to that found by a few others who used two or more terms for fitting experimental data (Begonia et al, 2010, Franceschini et al, 2006. However, even with two terms, the response of the Ogden model under tension was almost linear for white matter and corona radiata tissue.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…However, in this initial effort, the force in tension showed strain softening, which was not consistent with the experimental response documented by Jin et al (2013), which shows stiffening for strains higher than around 0.2. These results suggest that the mechanical response of the brain cannot be adequately simulated with one term in the hyperelastic energy functions, similar to that found by a few others who used two or more terms for fitting experimental data (Begonia et al, 2010, Franceschini et al, 2006. However, even with two terms, the response of the Ogden model under tension was almost linear for white matter and corona radiata tissue.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Similar to the material behavior of adult brain specimens found in some previous reports [ 13 , 32 36 ], the immature brainstem tissue showed a significant rate dependence in dynamic tensile tests in the present study. With an increase of the strain rate in the tensile tests, the immature porcine brainstem tissue became stiffer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Second, for reasons related to the size of the head and brain we could not perform mechanical testing in all ages under identical conditions. The slightly different loading rates and absolute strain could influence the measured values (Begonia et al, 2010). However, our observation that the changes in elastic and viscous parameters occurred at different age intervals indicates that the data are not an artifact of slightly different test parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%