1985
DOI: 10.1016/0029-5493(85)90056-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of strain-rate history on the ambient tensile strength of AISI type 316 stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several strain values were evaluated for each curve at a given elevated strain rate. A brief literature search [4,5] indicated that the shape of elevated strain rate curves for stainless steels relative to the quasi-static shape was similar (the addition of a constant to each stress point-'shifted') or expanding (multiplication of each stress point by a constant-'factored'). Variations in curve shape were addressed by applying both a shifted and a factored technique to determine the elevated strain rate curve.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several strain values were evaluated for each curve at a given elevated strain rate. A brief literature search [4,5] indicated that the shape of elevated strain rate curves for stainless steels relative to the quasi-static shape was similar (the addition of a constant to each stress point-'shifted') or expanding (multiplication of each stress point by a constant-'factored'). Variations in curve shape were addressed by applying both a shifted and a factored technique to determine the elevated strain rate curve.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial temperature is then known and its increase is calculated by assuming adiabatic heating. It was assumed that 90% of the plastic work contributes to the increase in temperature (Eleiche et al 1985, Lee et al 2006.…”
Section: Parameter Fitting Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the 7-d incubation, X80 dogbone coupons were tensile tested on a Model E44.304 electromechanical universal testing machine (MTS system, MN, USA). The applied strain rate was 0.004 s − 1 following literature (Eleiche et al, 1985).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%