2010
DOI: 10.3923/javaa.2010.1280.1284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Stocking Density on Growth and Feed Efficiency in Gilthead Seabream, Sparus aurata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Cuvin-Aralar et al, (2007) better growth of the giant fresh water prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) was achieved at low stocking density (15 prawns m 2 ) compared to those stocked at higher stocking density (90 prawns m 2 ). Some studies showed the increase in stocking densities improved growth performance parameter in gilthead sea bream (Yilmaz and Arabaci, 2010) in sea bass (Sammouth et al, 2009) this improved related to the immunological responses and physiological processes, mainly those related to metabolism and behavior (Barcellos et al, 2004;Kristiansen et al, 2004;Schram et al, 2006 andTan et al,2018). This was suggested to be as a result of increased metabolic cost caused by aggressive behavior at intermediate stocking density, and it was further suggested that aggressive behavior could be suppressed by a further increasing the stocking density.…”
Section: Growth Performance and Survival Rate Of Gilthead Sea Bream Frymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Cuvin-Aralar et al, (2007) better growth of the giant fresh water prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) was achieved at low stocking density (15 prawns m 2 ) compared to those stocked at higher stocking density (90 prawns m 2 ). Some studies showed the increase in stocking densities improved growth performance parameter in gilthead sea bream (Yilmaz and Arabaci, 2010) in sea bass (Sammouth et al, 2009) this improved related to the immunological responses and physiological processes, mainly those related to metabolism and behavior (Barcellos et al, 2004;Kristiansen et al, 2004;Schram et al, 2006 andTan et al,2018). This was suggested to be as a result of increased metabolic cost caused by aggressive behavior at intermediate stocking density, and it was further suggested that aggressive behavior could be suppressed by a further increasing the stocking density.…”
Section: Growth Performance and Survival Rate Of Gilthead Sea Bream Frymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the fact that gilthead seabream is one of the most important farmed fish species in the world, a major part of the continuous effort reported focused on improvement of its rearing conditions quality (Albrizio et al 2014;Basurco et al 2011;Cardinal et al 2011;De Boulton et al 2011;De Donno et al 2004;Loukovitis et al 2013;Papoutsoglou et al 1999;Somarakis et al 2013;Yilmaz and Arabaci 2010). As it should be expected, this attainment has been characterized by the investigation of the interactions of many rearing environmental parameters, bearing in mind that gilthead seabream is a euryhaline and eurythermal species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In aquaculture, feed represents 30–70% of farm costs (Doupé and Lymbery, 2004 ; de Verdal et al, 2018a ) and is the primary expenditure of intensive fish farming (Rana et al, 2009 ). Several ways have been investigated to improve the use of feed by fish, including nutrition (Reigh and Ellis, 1992 ; Gaylord and Gatlin, 2001 ; Yao et al, 2014 ), husbandry (Alanärä, 1996 ; Imsland et al, 2005 ; Yilmaz and Arabaci, 2010 ), and genetics (Kause et al, 2006b ; de Verdal et al, 2018b ; Knap and Kause, 2018 ; Besson et al, 2020 ). While nutrition and husbandry have been widely studied and applied in production, genetic approaches need more investigation to enable practical implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%