2008
DOI: 10.1080/09291010701682658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of social cues on circadian activity rhythm resynchronisation to the light–dark cycle in common marmosetsCallithrix jacchus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent data collected in our laboratory [Mendes et al, 2008] showed the influence of nest box availability on CAR in marmosets, extending the role of this resting place to marmoset maintenance. During LD phase shifts, marmosets not provided with nest boxes showed different responses to those observed by Erkert [1989] in animals with nest boxes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent data collected in our laboratory [Mendes et al, 2008] showed the influence of nest box availability on CAR in marmosets, extending the role of this resting place to marmoset maintenance. During LD phase shifts, marmosets not provided with nest boxes showed different responses to those observed by Erkert [1989] in animals with nest boxes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Despite interindividual variation in the nest box condition under the LD cycle (12: 12), activity onset occurred before lights on and offset around 1 h before lights off, as observed by Menezes et al [1996b] in seminatural and by Erkert [1989] in LDcontrolled conditions. In contrast, in the no-nest-box condition, there was a small delay for activity onset, which occurred after or at lights on, and a pronounced delay for offset, as seen in the CAR profiles of marmosets studied by Silva et al [2005] and Mendes et al [2008] in a controlled LD condition. Moreover, the animals showed a smaller day-to-day variability in activity onsets and offsets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The effect of this interaction was observed in studies where the presence of a previously synchronized conspecific increased the spectral power and amplitude of the circadian temperature rhythm in Wistar rats (Cambras et al, 2011) and accelerated the resynchronization of the circadian activity rhythm to a new LD cycle in degus (Goel & Lee, 1995 and marmosets (Mendes et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although in natural environments animals are subjected to photic, temperature, and social factors simultaneously, few studies have assessed the impact of the interactions between photic and nonphotic factors on circadian rhythms (Cambras et al, 2011, Goel & Lee, 1995Mendes et al, 2008). The effect of this interaction was observed in studies where the presence of a previously synchronized conspecific increased the spectral power and amplitude of the circadian temperature rhythm in Wistar rats (Cambras et al, 2011) and accelerated the resynchronization of the circadian activity rhythm to a new LD cycle in degus (Goel & Lee, 1995 and marmosets (Mendes et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In marmosets, social cues accelerate photic resynchronisation during phase delays. This effect may be associated with a greater light input due to the increase in animal activity in the presence of a previously synchronised conspecific (Mendes et al 2008).…”
Section: Animalmentioning
confidence: 99%