2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0266-3538(99)00170-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of size effects and dynamic loading on the fracture toughness of commercial GRP materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specimens were designed as three-or four-point bending of precracked beams, while the dynamic loading was applied using a modified split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB), a drop weight tower, or a modified Charpy tester [5]. Geary et al [6] studied the dynamic fracture toughness under different strain rates of glass reinforced polymer using three-point bending specimens, and they reported that the dynamic fracture toughness is higher than the static one owing to different failure modes. Samborski and Sadowski [7] compared the static and dynamic fracture toughness values for alumina and magnesia ceramics and investigated the effect of porosity on the fracture toughness and found that the increase of initial porosity reduces the values of both static and dynamic fracture characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specimens were designed as three-or four-point bending of precracked beams, while the dynamic loading was applied using a modified split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB), a drop weight tower, or a modified Charpy tester [5]. Geary et al [6] studied the dynamic fracture toughness under different strain rates of glass reinforced polymer using three-point bending specimens, and they reported that the dynamic fracture toughness is higher than the static one owing to different failure modes. Samborski and Sadowski [7] compared the static and dynamic fracture toughness values for alumina and magnesia ceramics and investigated the effect of porosity on the fracture toughness and found that the increase of initial porosity reduces the values of both static and dynamic fracture characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the measured values of fracture toughness often depend on the test specimen size and geometry, crack depth, and loading conditions. For example, there is a large amount of literatures (Pandey et al, 1998;Kulkarni et al, 2004;Geary et al, 2000;Hu, 2004;Ono et al, 2004;Kang et al, 2005) typically describing the increase of the cleavage fracture toughness with decreasing specimen thickness, associated with the transition from conditions of plane strain to plane stress due to the constraint loss effects. Even under plane strain conditions, constraint loss can be caused by large-scale in-plane plastic deformation with the decrement of the specimen size, when the size of the plastic zone is comparable to or larger than the characteristic length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, many researches have been conducted to obtain the variations of strength and stiffness of these composites with strain rate. However, most of the researches were concentrated on the behavior of the PMCs at high strain rates [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geary et al [15] investigated the influence of the dynamic rates on fracture toughness behavior of commercial glass-reinforced plastic materials. Dynamic tests produced higher fracture toughness values than those obtained statically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%