2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-013-0481-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Shearing Velocity on Shear Behavior of Artificial Joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent studies, artificial rock joints are generally used to study the rate-dependent strength behaviour of rock joints. Plaster of Paris is used to model the rock joints of soft rocks (Atapour and Moosavi 2013;Atapour and Moosavi 2014;Mirzaghorbanali et al 2014;Tang and Wong 2016;Wang et al 2016) and concrete/mortar is used to model rock joints of hard rocks (Jafari et al 2004;Atapour and Moosavi 2013;Atapour and Moosavi 2014). From these studies on artificial rock joints, it has been concluded that, with increasing shear velocity, the shear resistance of the rock joints increases for harder rocks while it reduces for softer rocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent studies, artificial rock joints are generally used to study the rate-dependent strength behaviour of rock joints. Plaster of Paris is used to model the rock joints of soft rocks (Atapour and Moosavi 2013;Atapour and Moosavi 2014;Mirzaghorbanali et al 2014;Tang and Wong 2016;Wang et al 2016) and concrete/mortar is used to model rock joints of hard rocks (Jafari et al 2004;Atapour and Moosavi 2013;Atapour and Moosavi 2014). From these studies on artificial rock joints, it has been concluded that, with increasing shear velocity, the shear resistance of the rock joints increases for harder rocks while it reduces for softer rocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An appropriate evaluation of shear behavior of rock joints is vital, for instance, when analyzing the stability of rock slopes, designing excavations in jointed rock, and designing rocksocked piles [1]. A considerable amount of work has been conducted to describe the shear behavior of rock joints [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. However, in a variety of geomechanical engineering applications, such as rock quarrying, rock drilling, rock excavation, and rock blasting, rock joints may be stressed and failed dynamically [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to shear behavior evaluation through laboratory investigation, the direct shear test and cyclic shear test have gained significant attention. Considering the spatial geometry and stress state of rock joints, direct shear tests [6,[16][17][18][19][20] and cyclic shear tests [7,8,[21][22][23][24][25] were conducted by different researchers from around the world. It should, however, be noted that the aforementioned shear test requires a costly shear test apparatus, and moreover, it involves a difficult, complex, and time-consuming procedure of sample collection and preparation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the past decades, numerous studies have been performed to investigate the shear behavior of rock joints under different conditions: constant normal load (CNL) and constant normal stiffness (CNS) [16][17][18][19][20]. However, the seepage behavior coupling with stress was not comprehensively involved in these studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%