2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of sexual selection and male agility on sexual size dimorphism in bustards (Otididae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
57
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variance in post-enclosure body mass was greater among non-TH than among TH males (Bartlett test; P=0.031). These data suggest that an intermediate body mass may be optimal for securing and maintaining exclusive territories, possibly because of the importance of agility and maneuverability in the dynamic actions of physical fighting (sensu Székely et al, 2000;Lailvaux et al, 2004;Lawler et al, 2005;Lailvaux and Irschick, 2006;Raihani et al, 2006;Lawler, 2009). Indeed, recent evidence from the same experimental system used in the present study indicates that males of intermediate body mass have greater reproductive fitness than larger or smaller males .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Variance in post-enclosure body mass was greater among non-TH than among TH males (Bartlett test; P=0.031). These data suggest that an intermediate body mass may be optimal for securing and maintaining exclusive territories, possibly because of the importance of agility and maneuverability in the dynamic actions of physical fighting (sensu Székely et al, 2000;Lailvaux et al, 2004;Lawler et al, 2005;Lailvaux and Irschick, 2006;Raihani et al, 2006;Lawler, 2009). Indeed, recent evidence from the same experimental system used in the present study indicates that males of intermediate body mass have greater reproductive fitness than larger or smaller males .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Using modern phylogenetic comparative methods, Abouheif and Fairbairn (1997) tested Rensch's rule within 40 taxonomically diverse groups and showed that the pattern generally holds for taxa with male-biased SSD. Several studies have also shown that Rensch's rule generally holds for taxa that exhibit mixed SSD (both male-biased and female-biased, Abouheif and Fairbairn 1997;Colwell 2000;Kratochvil and Frynta 2002;Szekely et al 2004;Young 2005;Raihani et al 2006). In contrast, most tests of Rensch's rule in taxa with exclusively femalebiased SSD have failed to confirm the pattern (Abouheif and Fairbairn 1997;Jannot and Kerans 2003;Tubaro and Bertelli 2003;Blanckenhorn et al 2007), waterstriders and some flies being notable exceptions (Abouheif and Fairbairn 1997;Blanckenhorn et al 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the evolution of SSD and Rensch's rule. The most prevalent explanation is that SSD evolves through the action of sexual selection (Darwin 1871;Clutton-Brock et al 1977), whereby intense sexual selection drives the evolution of body size of one sex, accompanied by weaker correlated selection on body size in the other sex (Fairbairn 1997;Raihani et al 2006;Dale et al 2007). Thus, this model predicts the evolution of male-biased SSD when selection is stronger on male than on female size (Fairbairn 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%