2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0341-8162(02)00027-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of seed size and shape on their removal by water erosion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
76
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
76
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Seed capture can result from wind-driven processes (James et al, 2009) or water deposition (Cerda and Garcia-Fayos, 2002), and in this study, relatively high levels of runoff from the biologically crusted surfaces provided the mechanism for seed movement (hydrochory). The extent to which seeds move likely depends on factors such as seed mass and shape, depth of sheet flow and spatial arrangement of surface obstructions.…”
Section: Seed Dispersal and Capturementioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Seed capture can result from wind-driven processes (James et al, 2009) or water deposition (Cerda and Garcia-Fayos, 2002), and in this study, relatively high levels of runoff from the biologically crusted surfaces provided the mechanism for seed movement (hydrochory). The extent to which seeds move likely depends on factors such as seed mass and shape, depth of sheet flow and spatial arrangement of surface obstructions.…”
Section: Seed Dispersal and Capturementioning
confidence: 64%
“…Pits and depressions (Milton et al, 1997;Isselin-Nondedeu et al, 2006). Only one species of seed was used in this study, however, and the relative effect of runoff water on seed movement may well have been different had different shaped seeds or those with appendages or mucilaginous secretions been used (Cerda and Garcia-Fayos, 2002;Isselin-Nondedeu et al, 2006). Observations of natural seed germination in pits in this study area show that they support substantially more germinants that adjacent non-pit surfaces, but the extent to which they enhance plant survival is largely unknown.…”
Section: Seed Dispersal and Capturementioning
confidence: 97%
“…These results are consistent with previous research on seedling emergence (Eldridge et al, 2012;Benigno et al, 2013) where soil treatment and tested plant species were different. Cerdà and García-Fayos (2002) and Bochet (2015) noted the influence of the size and shape of seeds in their removal by water erosion. Our results are partly consistent, considering that the heaviest seeds (especially Acer campestre) were completely removed on untreated plots, but we did not have sufficient measurements on the seeds of the tested species to continue analysis of these criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lewis et al (2013) highlighted the potential for soil erosion to disseminate the spontaneous grass cover seedbank and to improve the biodiversity indicators in agro-ecosystems of northern Europe. In natural Mediterranean systems, Cerdá and García-Fayos (2002) and García-Fayos et al (2010) described the susceptibility to seed removal by water erosion according to seed and landscape features. In this context, an annual sediment delivery ratio of 4 % was found in PG using the SEDD model (Sediment Delivery Distributed; Taguas el al., 2011), while in Conchuela the value was over 90 % indicating an efficient rate of transport, as calculated by Burguet (2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%