The influence of scale-dependent geodiversity on species distribution models in a biodiversity hotspot

Abstract

Improving models of species' distributions is essential for conservation, especially in light of global change. Species distribution models (SDMs) often rely on mean environmental conditions, yet species distributions are also a function of environmental heterogeneity and filtering acting at multiple spatial scales. Geodiversity, which we define as the variation of abiotic features and processes of Earth's entire geosphere (inclusive of climate), has potential to improve SDMs and conservation assessments, as they capture multiple abiotic dimensions of species niches, however they have not been sufficiently tested in SDMs. We tested a range of geodiversity variables computed at varying scales using climate and elevation data. We compared predictive performance of MaxEnt SDMs generated using CHELSA bioclimatic variables to those also including geodiversity variables for 31 mammalian species in Colombia. Results show the spatial grain of geodiversity variables affects SDM performance. Some variables consistently exhibited an increasing or decreasing trend in variable importance with spatial grain, showing slight scale-dependence and indicating that some geodiversity variables are more relevant at particular scales for some species. Incorporating geodiversity variables into SDMs, and doing so at the appropriate spatial scales, enhances the ability to model species-environment relationships, thereby contributing to the conservation and management of biodiversity. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue ‘Geodiversity for science and society’.

Geodiversity for science and society

“…Geodiversity-biodiversity relationships are addressed empirically in two papers. Gerstner et al [13] highlight the importance of considering the resolution of geodiversity data for species distribution modelling. The validity of taking a Conserving Nature's Stage approach to biodiversity conservation is assessed by Miller et al [14], who find that conserving geophysical characteristics as surrogate sites for biodiversity is an effective conservation approach.…”

“…Gerstner et al . [ 13 ] highlight the importance of considering the resolution of geodiversity data for species distribution modelling. The validity of taking a Conserving Nature's Stage approach to biodiversity conservation is assessed by Miller et al .…”