2012
DOI: 10.1016/s2305-0500(13)60051-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of sample volume applied to the Makler sperm counting chamber upon the measured concentration of latex beads: A multi-centre study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This characterization is crucial for designing optimal new microfluidic devices in view of medical applications 52 . In addition it could be helpful for testing the good performance of the present protocols of semen analysis and the clinical laboratories accreditation, which are using non-propelled latex beads 53 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This characterization is crucial for designing optimal new microfluidic devices in view of medical applications 52 . In addition it could be helpful for testing the good performance of the present protocols of semen analysis and the clinical laboratories accreditation, which are using non-propelled latex beads 53 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…52 In addition, it could be helpful for testing the good performance of the present protocols of semen analysis and the clinical laboratories accreditation, which are using nonpropelled latex beads. 53 It is also instructive to investigate the speed of sperm cells in the confined environment. Let us first describe the three different approaches typically used in the biomedical community for characterizing the sperm cell velocity: (1) the VCL, which is the curvilinear velocity of the …”
Section: -3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the WHO ( 2010 ) recommends the use of an improved capacity Neubauer haemocytometer to count immobilized (diluted in deionized water) sperm to determine concentration, laboratories overall persist using a Makler counting chamber because of unfamiliarity, habit or practical ease, disregarding the improved accuracy of the recommended Neubauer chamber. Indeed, overgoing volume errors when pipetting (3 - 10μl admitted volume) allowing highly motile sperm to ‘reservoir’ under the counting grid and the risk of assessing artificially increased concentration and motility if a sample’s assessment is performed before its consistent distribution under the chamber’s empty space (inverse correlation between time elapsed at sample inclusion and assessment) are main sources of error, inaccuracy and inter-operator variablity when using a Makler chamber ( Walls et al, 2012 ; Franken, 2013 ; Björndahl et al, 2016 ; Tomlinson, 2016 ; Ahadi et al, 2019 ; Zuvela and Matson, 2020 ). In spite of this, the capacity of simultaneously estimate sperm concentration and motility, actual outline of simplified sperm assessment, permitting the successive run-up of several samples in a shorter time, is a practical perk still favouring the use of a Makler chamber in most laboratories, nevertheless.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This 0.1 ml of 10% formalin in isotonic saline was added to the remaining neat (nondiluted) ejaculate sample. The sperm concentration sample collected in 10% formalin in isotonic saline was determined with a Makler chamber (Sukcharoen et al ., 1994; Walls et al ., 2012). Once a concentration was measured, the total number of spermatozoa was determined by multiplying by the dilution factor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%