2011
DOI: 10.33899/rden.2011.45475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Saliva, Artificial Saliva and Propolis Extract on the Wettability of Heat−Cured and Visible Light−Cured Denture Base Material

Abstract: Aims: To evaluate and compare the effect of human saliva, artificial saliva and propolis extract on the wettability of heat−cured and visible light −cured denture base material .Materials and Methods: A total of 80 samples were prepared , 40 samples prepared from heat cured resin and the other 40 samples were prepared from light cured resin. These two groups were divided into four subgroups, control group, human saliva, artificial saliva and propolis. Contact angle measurements by sessile drop method with a mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(9,10,14,27) Storing the fl exible denture base samples in chlorhexidine and artifi cial saliva results in improving in the wettability Figure (3). These results agree with the results of AL-Nema (26) and Sharma and Vidya. (28) Sodium hypochlorite causes worsening eff ect on the wettability especially the polished surface Figure (3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(9,10,14,27) Storing the fl exible denture base samples in chlorhexidine and artifi cial saliva results in improving in the wettability Figure (3). These results agree with the results of AL-Nema (26) and Sharma and Vidya. (28) Sodium hypochlorite causes worsening eff ect on the wettability especially the polished surface Figure (3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…While the highest mean contact angle values were observed in polished surfaces of samples stored in sodium hypochlorite for 1-day too Figure (2). When compared this result with results of AL-Nema (26) we can fi nd that (with in the limit of this study) the wettability of fl exible denture base material was better than the wettability of visible light cured resin and it was less than the wettability of heat cured resin denture base material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The wettability on the solid surface is measured by the contact an-gleʼs meeting point at the solidairliquid, which is a widely known technique. The obtained values depend on the surface tension of the liquid, surface energy of the solid substrate, and surface topography (23,24) . As previously described, a material exhibiting a contact angle greater than 90° is considered hydrophobic, whereas a material with a value smaller than 90° is considered hy-drophilic (25) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%