2011
DOI: 10.1017/s0952523810000556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of retinal illuminance on L- and M-cone driven electroretinograms

Abstract: The electroretinographic response to L-and M-cone isolating stimuli was measured at different luminance levels to study the effect of retinal illuminance on amplitude and phase, and how this may influence estimates of L:M ratios in the retina. It was found that the amplitude of L-and M-cone driven responses increases differently with increasing retinal illuminance: L-cone responses increase more quickly than those of M-cones. The L:M ratio does not change strongly with retinal illuminance. The phase of both L-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although colour vision is normal in his case, I.J.M. is known to have an unusually high proportion of long‐wavelength cones (see Kremers et al 2011) and it is therefore unsurprising that his isoluminant red:green ratio is shifted towards green (RGR = 0.4). As would be expected, the dichromats also show a displaced isoluminant value (0.35 for the deuteranope, 0.8 for the protanope), indicating the need for a higher than normal proportion of one colour to balance the other.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although colour vision is normal in his case, I.J.M. is known to have an unusually high proportion of long‐wavelength cones (see Kremers et al 2011) and it is therefore unsurprising that his isoluminant red:green ratio is shifted towards green (RGR = 0.4). As would be expected, the dichromats also show a displaced isoluminant value (0.35 for the deuteranope, 0.8 for the protanope), indicating the need for a higher than normal proportion of one colour to balance the other.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The comparison of the responses to the cone isolating stimuli with each other and with the conditions in which the two are modulated simultaneously reveals a few interesting features. In previous measurements, using modulation at high temporal frequency, it was found that the L-cone driven responses are generally larger than the M-cone driven responses reflecting the larger number of L-cones (Brainard et al, 2000; Kremers, Parry, Panorgias & Murray, 2011; Kremers et al, 2000). However, in Figures 4 and 5 it can be seen that the response amplitudes in the asymmetries to L-and M-cone stimuli are similar when the cone contrasts are similar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In a number of studies there have been attempts to identify and isolate long-(L), middle-(M), and short-(S) wavelength-sensitive cone mechanisms within the ERG response [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. In many of these experiments, cone isolation was usually achieved either by chromatic adaptation [18] or silent substitution [25] methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%