2003
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200302000-00020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Resting Periods on Friction in the Artificial Hip

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
25
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Fabry et al [28] have shown significant differences between daily life activities on the basis of slide tracks which represent the path of the femur relative to the pelvis during motion. Previous studies of Nassut et al [47] and Wimmer et al [48] reported a correlation between increases in the initial friction moment with increasing resting duration. Other conditions such as obesity, suboptimal implant placement, or a variation of the load direction have also received less attention to date [27,49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Fabry et al [28] have shown significant differences between daily life activities on the basis of slide tracks which represent the path of the femur relative to the pelvis during motion. Previous studies of Nassut et al [47] and Wimmer et al [48] reported a correlation between increases in the initial friction moment with increasing resting duration. Other conditions such as obesity, suboptimal implant placement, or a variation of the load direction have also received less attention to date [27,49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This is the result of increased surface roughness, particulate metal debris between the articulating surfaces, lower synovial fluid viscosity, increased bearing clearance and abnormal motion behaviour of hip implant components. Generally, coefficient of friction in CoC hip devices is in the range of 0.04-0.13 [80,[101][102][103]. Nassutt and colleagues [101] reported a coefficient of friction varying from 0.104 for no resting duration up to 0.131 for resting duration of 60 seconds.…”
Section: Frictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, coefficient of friction in CoC hip devices is in the range of 0.04-0.13 [80,[101][102][103]. Nassutt and colleagues [101] reported a coefficient of friction varying from 0.104 for no resting duration up to 0.131 for resting duration of 60 seconds. This increase in coefficient of friction after rest is due to loss of fluid film lubrication and subsequent surface to surface contact when the relative velocity between the bearing surfaces is reduced.…”
Section: Frictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A hip simulator protocol incorporating intermittent motion led to wear increase above that for continuous motion simulation, for metalon-metal implants, although the absolute wear rates still remained below those typical of retrieval studies. 16 A start-stop protocol 17 led to an increase in static friction after periods of rest, for a variety of bearing surfaces, suggestive of higher wear shortly after start-up. Stair descent, when combined with level walking, resulted in a significant increase in wear in a knee simulator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%