The Influence of Research Compensation Options on Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) Physician Participation: A North Texas (NorTex) PBRN Study

Young, Richard A.; Fulda, Kimberly; Suzuki, Sumihiro; Hahn, Kristen A.; Espinoza, Anna; Marshall, James D.; Moore, Billy J.; Cardarelli, Roberto

doi:10.3122/jabfm.2011.05.100291

Cited by 8 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Lack of financial incentives has been identified as a barrier to participating in research with PCPs [ 16 ]. Studies have found that some physicians believe monetary compensation demonstrates that the physician’s time is valued, [ 27 ] and that this incentive also can increase a physician’s likelihood to participate in research [ 38 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient and physician perspectives on engaging in palliative and healthcare trials: a qualitative descriptive study

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Researchers are encountering increasing challenges in recruiting participants for palliative and healthcare research. This paper aims to understand challenges to and methods for engaging physicians and seriously ill patients and their caregivers in research studies. Methods Between October 2019 to July 2020, we conducted qualitative interviews with 25 patients, proxies, and caregivers participants who were eligible for a randomized controlled trial of home-based palliative care and 31 physicians from participating accountable care organizations. Using thematic analysis, we analyzed participants’ responses to identify concepts and key ideas within the text. From these initial concepts, core themes around barriers to research and preferred research recruitment approaches were generated. Results Themes from patient and caregiver interviews included time constraints, privacy concerns, lack of research familiarity, disconnect with research institution, self-perceived health status, and concerns with study randomization. Physician-identified barriers focused on time constraints and study randomization. Patient and caregiver recommendations for study recruitment included in-person recruitment, recruitment at healthcare providers’ offices, recruitment via mail, additional study information, and frequent calls. Physician recommendations were related to placement of flyers at clinics, financial incentives, and formal events. Conclusions Findings demonstrated that although patients and caregivers prefer that their physicians recruit them for health-related research studies, physicians identified time constraints as a consistent barrier to research involvement.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient and physician perspectives on engaging in palliative and healthcare trials: a qualitative descriptive study

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…11 Accordingly, most research on PBRN recruitment and enrollment has been with adults and has primarily focused on provider and community engagement. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Few PBRN studies have focused on child or parent perspectives, and these have primarily been from dental or chiropractic PBRNs. 20 -22 To address this knowledge gap, we designed and implemented a study within our pediatric PBRN to better understand parents' perceptions about and preferences for participation in child health research.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Parent Perceptions of and Preferences for Participation in Child Health Research: Results from a Pediatric Practice-Based Research Network

Engster

Fascetti

Daw³

et al. 2019

J Am Board Fam Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Recruitment efforts for child health research are often based on assumptions, therefore improving knowledge about parents' perceptions and preferences could enhance engagement. Aim/Objective: 1) To describe parents' perceptions about and preferences for participation in child health research within a pediatric practice-based research network (PBRN), and 2) to investigate any associations with the presence of on-site PBRN research staff, office location, and child age. Methods: We conducted a 2-phase study with a convenience sample of parents from diverse office settings. Phase 1 was a qualitative assessment using semistructured, in-person interviews. Phase 2 consisted of a quantitative self-administered survey assessing: 1) perceptions of importance, benefits/motivations, and risks/barriers of child health research, and 2) preferences for recruitment method and enrollment location. Results: Parents (n ‫؍‬ 627) uniformly perceived child health research to be important in prevention (89%), diagnosis (89%), and treatment (92%). They were motivated to participate most commonly by altruism and rarely by compensation. Parents perceived side effects (60%), discomfort (52%), and time (45%) as the main risks of participation. Most parents preferred to learn about research opportunities at their pediatric office (70%), and if interested, to enroll their child in their pediatric office (57%) or in their home (52%). Parents were significantly more altruistic and interested in participation in offices with on-site PBRN research staff and greater proximity to the University. Conclusions: Child health researchers could enhance participation by using recruitment resources and enrollment strategies that match parent preferences, including engagement by on-site PBRN staff.

show abstract

“…The research team will need to ensure that the objectives of the project align with the organization's objectives for patient outcomes improvement, resource allocation, and business case. Integration or blending of research with quality improvement (20) with financial considerations to compensate participants for their time (21) or to provide other direct or indirect monetary value may be some of the strategies to demonstrate additional value ('carrot') to the practices and organizations. One of the potential incentives ('carrots') that is widely acknowledged among providers is an opportunity to obtain continuous medical education (CME) credits.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recruiting primary care practices for practice-based research: a case study of a group-randomized study (TRANSLATE CKD) recruitment process

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Influence of Research Compensation Options on Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) Physician Participation: A North Texas (NorTex) PBRN Study

Cited by 8 publications

References 16 publications

Patient and physician perspectives on engaging in palliative and healthcare trials: a qualitative descriptive study

Patient and physician perspectives on engaging in palliative and healthcare trials: a qualitative descriptive study

Parent Perceptions of and Preferences for Participation in Child Health Research: Results from a Pediatric Practice-Based Research Network

Recruiting primary care practices for practice-based research: a case study of a group-randomized study (TRANSLATE CKD) recruitment process

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About