2011
DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(2010/09-0031)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Receiver Size on Magnitude of Acoustic and Perceived Measures of Occlusion

Abstract: Measured and perceived occlusion was minor in all receiver conditions. Occlusion was not correlated to ear canal volume, suggesting that RIC hearing aids most often result in negligible amounts of measured and perceived occlusion effect, regardless of ear canal size. Because no significant relationship existed between the occlusion measures, clinicians may need to consider that self-rating of occlusion may not match measured occlusion results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a decreased perception of occlusion as there is an increase in the diameter of the vent as well as a decrease in acoustic mass (Kamp & Wynne, 1996;Kiessling et al, 2005;Vasil & Cienkowski, 2006;Vasil-Dilaj & Cienkowski, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There is a decreased perception of occlusion as there is an increase in the diameter of the vent as well as a decrease in acoustic mass (Kamp & Wynne, 1996;Kiessling et al, 2005;Vasil & Cienkowski, 2006;Vasil-Dilaj & Cienkowski, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After listening to a recorded sentence, the participant was asked to rate the selfperceived level of occlusion of the male talker's voice using a 5-point rating scale which ranged from No Occlusion to Complete Occlusion (Vasil-Dilaj & Cienkowski, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations