2020
DOI: 10.1080/15257770.2020.1803354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of quality of primers on the formation of primer dimers in PCR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When using DNA #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, and #6 at low concentrations of less than 10 5 molecules, nonspecific amplification such as primer dimers was observed, and we did not obtain linear calibration curves. Even primers designed using mathematical models sometimes form nonspecific products in negative controls and require PCR optimization. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When using DNA #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, and #6 at low concentrations of less than 10 5 molecules, nonspecific amplification such as primer dimers was observed, and we did not obtain linear calibration curves. Even primers designed using mathematical models sometimes form nonspecific products in negative controls and require PCR optimization. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even primers designed using mathematical models sometimes form nonspecific products in negative controls and require PCR optimization. 37,38 As an initial trial, the nanopore filter experiment was performed using six different types of ssDNA, DNA #1−6, under conventional conditions for nanopore sensing. Clear blocking signals of ssDNA (160 nM) translocation events were observed for the buffer condition of 1 M KCl, 10 mM MOPS, pH 7.0.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, a 10-fold reduction of the enzyme amount resulted in a significant decrease of the threshold cycle (Ct) value (∼6 cycles) for RNA-positive samples. A 2-fold decrease of the primers and dNTP concentration decreased Ct values as well, probably due to the suppression of nonspecific amplification caused by the competition between specific and nonspecific DNA synthesis [ 35 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some subgroup analyses were conducted to identify the sources of heterogeneity, many unmeasured moderators have impacts on the results. For example, the primer sets used in the included studies varied, and the sensitivity of different primer sets was unclear [ 74 ]. Finally, similar with other meta-analyses on tick-borne infections [ 11 , 75 , 76 ], publication bias exists in the present study, which may distort the estimates of prevalence, so results should be interpreted with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%