The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of proximal ulnar morphology on elbow range of motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are consistent with clinical observations that the coronoid process may not be locked in the coronoid fossae during elbow flexion due to the development of muscles and soft tissues in the anterior aspect of the limb. These muscles, such as the biceps brachi, brachioradialis, and flexor capi radialis together with soft tissues such as skin and adipose tissue would likely restrict the range of flexion (Rouleau et al, ). To the contrary, the olecranon process occupies the olecranon fossa in full extension (Mays, ) thereby limiting hyperextension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings are consistent with clinical observations that the coronoid process may not be locked in the coronoid fossae during elbow flexion due to the development of muscles and soft tissues in the anterior aspect of the limb. These muscles, such as the biceps brachi, brachioradialis, and flexor capi radialis together with soft tissues such as skin and adipose tissue would likely restrict the range of flexion (Rouleau et al, ). To the contrary, the olecranon process occupies the olecranon fossa in full extension (Mays, ) thereby limiting hyperextension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ulna has been described to have a physiologic apex dorsal bow that has been named as ''proximal ulna dorsal angulation'' (PUDA) and this angle is very important for the anatomic reduction of the fractures of proximal ulna. In the literature, the mean PUDA was found 5.7° [15,16] [19]. These studies pointed out that if the magnitude of PUDA increased, maximum elbow extension and global elbow range of motion (ROM) would have decreased [22].…”
Section: Varus Angulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,7 The PUDA was shown to correlated to the range of motion of the elbow. 21 Elbows with a smaller PUDA (<4.9 ) had been shown to have significantly greater terminal extension (mean of 4.2 ) but similar terminal flexion compared with elbow with larger PUDA.…”
Section: The Anatomy Of Proximal Ulnamentioning
confidence: 90%