2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of proximal stem geometry and surface finish on the fixation of a double-tapered cemented femoral stem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distal cross‐sections of the prostheses shifted to the proximal cross‐sections along the profiles of the prostheses. Therefore, the profiles not only control the load transfer mechanism from the hip joint to the bone but also affect prosthetic stiffness (rigidity) and accordingly SE. The interface properties elicited no significant effect on SE because the prosthetic stiffness is independent of the interface properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distal cross‐sections of the prostheses shifted to the proximal cross‐sections along the profiles of the prostheses. Therefore, the profiles not only control the load transfer mechanism from the hip joint to the bone but also affect prosthetic stiffness (rigidity) and accordingly SE. The interface properties elicited no significant effect on SE because the prosthetic stiffness is independent of the interface properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Composite anatomic tibias, designed and validated for the purpose of biomechanical testing, were used to minimize specimen variability and increase the precision of the experiments in detecting differences due to fracture pattern or implant configuration (Medium Tibia 3401; Sawbones). [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Dynax IMNs were designed by the primary author (US Patent WO2014075025A1) and fabricated using Ti-6Al-4V alloy (Mount Mfg). Each nail contains a titanium alloy spring (Orlando Spring) with a constant of 32.2 N/mm, which allows axial motion between the two parts of the nail (Figure 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Composite anatomic tibias, designed and validated for the purpose of biomechanical testing, were used to minimize specimen variability and increase the precision of the experiments in detecting differences due to fracture pattern or implant configuration (Medium Tibia 3401; Sawbones) 25–33 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Composite anatomic first metatarsal and medial cuneiform bones were designed and created by Sawbones, Pacific Research Laboratories for the purpose of this study. Similar to composite femurs, tibias, and other synthetic models available through Sawbones, and validated by numerous studies, [12][13][14][15][16] each bone was fabricated from a reinforced epoxy resin designed to simulate the mechanical properties of cortical bone, and polyurethane foam with appropriate density to simulate the mechanical properties of cancellous bone. The thickness of the epoxy resin used to mimic the outer cortical bone shell was determined based on radiographs of cadaveric specimens taken at our institution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%