The influence of prosocial priming on visual perspective taking and automatic imitation

Abstract

Imitation and perspective taking are core features of non-verbal social interactions. We imitate one another to signal a desire to affiliate and consider others’ points of view to better understand their perspective. Prior research suggests that a relationship exists between prosocial behaviour and imitation. For example, priming prosocial behaviours has been shown to increase imitative tendencies in automatic imitation tasks. Despite its importance during social interactions, far less is known about how perspective taking might relate to either prosociality or imitation. The current study investigates the relationship between automatic imitation and perspective taking by testing the extent to which these skills are similarly modulated by prosocial priming. Across all experimental groups, a surprising ceiling effect emerged in the perspective taking task (the Director’s Task), which prevented the investigation of prosocial priming on perspective taking. A comparison of other studies using the Director’s Task shows wide variability in accuracy scores across studies and is suggestive of low task reliability. In addition, despite using a high-power design, and contrary to three previous studies, no effect of prosocial prime on imitation was observed. Meta-analysing all studies to date suggests that the effects of prosocial primes on imitation are variable and could be small. The current study, therefore, offers caution when using the computerised Director’s Task as a measure of perspective taking with adult populations, as it shows high variability across studies and may suffer from a ceiling effect. In addition, the results question the size and robustness of prosocial priming effects on automatic imitation. More generally, by reporting null results we hope to minimise publication bias and by meta-analysing results as studies emerge and making data freely available, we hope to move towards a more cumulative science of social cognition.

The impact of model eyesight on automatic imitation in virtual reality

“…In line with our results, previous studies also found that the effects of social factors on automatic imitation in the typical imitation-inhibition task are often small (e.g., Newey et al, 2019), potentially caused by the limited ecological validity of this task. In that regard, it could be that our paradigm was still not realistic enough to elicit real-life social effects consistently.…”

Group membership does not modulate automatic imitation

“…Interestingly, the conclusion that automatic imitation is not affected by group membership fits to several other recent findings illustrating the resilience of automatic imitation against social modulations. For example, recent research found difficulties in replicating correlations between automatic imitation and different interindividual differences including autism-like traits, narcissism, empathy, and perspective taking (Butler et al, 2015 ; Cracco, Bardi, et al, 2018 ; Galang & Obhi, 2020 ; Genschow et al, 2017 ; Müller et al, 2013 ; Newey et al, 2019 ). Likewise, Khemka et al ( 2020 ) could not replicate the finding that sitting in front of a mirror reduces automatic imitation (Spengler et al, 2010 ).…”

Smaller Than Expected

“…Of course, our study is not the first to deal with the absence of a social modulation of imitative action regulation effects (e.g., Newey et al, 2019 ; see also Cracco, Genschow et al, 2018 ; Cracco, Bardi et al, 2018 , for a meta-analysis on social moderators of automatic imitation). Still, we want to emphasize that reporting the present null findings is important in several respects.…”