2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11238-010-9193-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of probabilities on the response mode bias in utility elicitation

Abstract: Utility elicitation, Response mode bias, Probabilities, Risk preference, Cardinal measurement, Arrow–Pratt measure, Gain and loss,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the data from the most extreme probabilities were analyzed separately from AUC values to determine if the manipulations of whether the money was won or owed and whether the amount was small or large, or both, would be differentially influential when the outcome was very likely or very unlikely. Such differences might be expected from a theoretical perspective, given that risk aversion or proneness may vary as a function of whether or not the outcome is likely or unlikely (e.g., Schwand, Vetschera, & Wakolbinger, 2010). Prior to conducting these analyses, the indifference points for the $100,000 outcomes were divided by 100 so as to standardize the values between the two amounts.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Discounting Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the data from the most extreme probabilities were analyzed separately from AUC values to determine if the manipulations of whether the money was won or owed and whether the amount was small or large, or both, would be differentially influential when the outcome was very likely or very unlikely. Such differences might be expected from a theoretical perspective, given that risk aversion or proneness may vary as a function of whether or not the outcome is likely or unlikely (e.g., Schwand, Vetschera, & Wakolbinger, 2010). Prior to conducting these analyses, the indifference points for the $100,000 outcomes were divided by 100 so as to standardize the values between the two amounts.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Discounting Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both modern and proven concepts seek to resolve economic and financial issues. However, the reaction mode bias, in which subjects show distinctive risk states of mind when evaluating certainty counterparts versus impassion probabilities, could be a well-known bias within the appraisal of utility functions (Schwand, Vetschera, & Wakolbinger, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%