1994
DOI: 10.1207/s15327027hc0601_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Prior Thought and Intent on the Memorability and Persuasiveness of Organ Donation Message strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
16
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
6
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the present study support the positive association of earlier experiences in relation to organ donation with actual registration or registration intention that was found in previous studies (Carducci et al, 1989;Nolan and McGarth, 1990;Birkimer et al, 1994;Smith et al, 1994;Brug et al, 2000;. In those studies, adolescents who had ever thought about organ donation, who had discussed this topic with others, who knew someone else who died and donated organs, or who ever completed a registration card before, were more likely to register as a posthumous organ donor.…”
Section: Study Groupsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results of the present study support the positive association of earlier experiences in relation to organ donation with actual registration or registration intention that was found in previous studies (Carducci et al, 1989;Nolan and McGarth, 1990;Birkimer et al, 1994;Smith et al, 1994;Brug et al, 2000;. In those studies, adolescents who had ever thought about organ donation, who had discussed this topic with others, who knew someone else who died and donated organs, or who ever completed a registration card before, were more likely to register as a posthumous organ donor.…”
Section: Study Groupsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Most real life organ donation campaigns try to reach people of all ages, including college students. In addition, the ideal donor is a healthy young adult (Horton & Horton, 1991;Smith et al, 1994). In a study sampling a diverse adult population, Morgan and Miller (2002b) obtained results that paralleled previous studies using a student population (e.g., Kopfman & Smith, 1996).…”
Section: Limitations Of This Study and Recommendations For Future Resmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…A substantial body of research has investigated the connection between attitudes toward organ donation and willingness to become a posthumous organ donor (e.g., Kopfman & Smith, 1996;Morgan & Miller, 2002b;Parisi & Katz, 1986;Skowronski, 1997;Smith, Morrison, Kopfman, & Ford, 1994;Sque & Payne, 1994). A parallel body of research shows a connection between positive attitudes toward organ donation and religious/spiritual beliefs.…”
Section: Hypotheses For Testing Scale Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior thought about an issue indicates that a person has existing information about an issue that he or she can access to integrate new information from a persuasive message. One antecedent variable that has been associated highly with organ donor card outcomes is the prior thought that people report about signing the donor card (Kopfman & Smith, 1996;Kopfman, Smith, Ah Yun, & Hodges, 1998;Smith, Morrison, Kopfman, & Ford, 1994). These researchers found that people who had engaged in prior thought about organ donation were more likely to engage in cognitive processing of an organ donation persuasive message, more willing to change beliefs about organ donation, and more likely to take a significantly higher proportion of brochures containing organ donor cards than were people low in prior thought.…”
Section: Systematic Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure cognitive processing for the message after a period of time has elapsed, a recognition memory paradigm can be used (Greene, Smith, & Lindsey, 1990). Message recognition tests have been employed previously to assess if organ donation messages have been processed in the systematic mode (Ford & Smith, 1991;Smith et al, 1994). These tests assess whether or not people can identify statements correctly as having been part of the original message.…”
Section: Cognitive Message Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%