The influence of preprocessing on text classification using a bag-of-words representation

Abstract

Text classification (TC) is the task of automatically assigning documents to a fixed number of categories. TC is an important component in many text applications. Many of these applications perform preprocessing. There are different types of text preprocessing, e.g., conversion of uppercase letters into lowercase letters, HTML tag removal, stopword removal, punctuation mark removal, lemmatization, correction of common misspelled words, and reduction of replicated characters. We hypothesize that the application of different combinations of preprocessing methods can improve TC results. Therefore, we performed an extensive and systematic set of TC experiments (and this is our main research contribution) to explore the impact of all possible combinations of five/ six basic preprocessing methods on four benchmark text corpora (and not samples of them) using three ML methods and training and test sets. The general conclusion (at least for the datasets verified) is that it is always advisable to perform an extensive and systematic variety of preprocessing methods combined with TC experiments because it contributes to improve TC accuracy. For all the tested datasets, there was always at least one combination of basic preprocessing methods that could be recommended to significantly improve the TC using a BOW representation. For three datasets, stopword removal was the only single preprocessing method that enabled a significant improvement compared to the baseline result using a bag of 1,000-word unigrams. For some of the datasets, there was minimal improvement when we removed HTML tags, performed spelling correction or removed punctuation marks, and reduced replicated characters. However, for the fourth dataset, the stopword removal was not beneficial. Instead, the conversion of uppercase letters into lowercase letters was the only single preprocessing method that demonstrated a significant improvement compared to the baseline result. The best result for this dataset was obtained when we performed spelling correction and conversion into lowercase letters. In general, for all the datasets processed, there was always at least one combination of basic preprocessing methods that could be recommended to improve the accuracy results when using a bag-of-words representation.

Ensembling Classical Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for Morbidity Identification From Clinical Notes

“…In this context, the authors in [40] observed a decrease in performances of SVM classification models from 70.76% to 55.26% for the task of automatic annotation of clinical text fragments based on codebooks having a large number of categories. Similarly, authors in [41], [42] also reported the underperformance of the employed classification models for text classification as a consequence of removing the stopwords. In the case of the DL models, we have used BiLSTM layers, which handle the long-term dependencies and have the capability to store information for a long duration.…”

Multi-level aspect based sentiment classification of Twitter data: using hybrid approach in deep learning

“…Consequently, it is needed to preprocess the tweets before analyzing them so that all the irrelevant attributes are removed from the datasets to avoid the contradiction of results. In this research, we have preprocessed all the datasets equally at multiple stages as described in the literature (HaCohen-Kerner, Miller & Yigal, 2020) and got improved results. Text pre-processing includes data cleansing by removing the unrelated data, including URLs, stop words, smilies, slang, redundant data, and all other irrelevant material.…”

Supervised topic modeling for predicting molecular substructure from mass spectrometry

“…To model a mass spectrum using LLDA, it is necessary to represent a mass spectrum as a bag-of-words "document" 23 . First, any fragment having a mass-to-charge-ratio (m/z) below 30 is discarded to remove structurally uninformative fragments.…”