2015
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of preceding dive cycles on the foraging decisions of Antarctic fur seals

Abstract: The foraging strategy of many animals is thought to be determined by their past experiences. However, few empirical studies have investigated whether this is true in diving animals. We recorded three-dimensional movements and mouth-opening events from three Antarctic fur seals during their foraging trips to examine how they adapt their behaviour based on past experience-continuing to search for prey in the same area or moving to search in a different place. Each dive cycle was divided into a transit phase and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When high prey encounter rate is met, elephant seals adjust their diving behaviour by increasing both their descent and ascent angle (Figs 1 and 2), likely to minimize their transit time (Figs 5 and 6), and increase both their horizontal and vertical sinuosity during the bottom phase of their dive zigzagging within the prey patch layer (Figs 1 and 2). The negative relationship between the horizontal transit rate and putative feeding activity has been observed for numerous marine predators (SES [19] see also Figure A in S3 Appendix, northern elephant seals ( Mirounga angustirostris ) [79], wandering albatross ( Diomedea exulan ), antarctic fur seals ( Arctocephalus gazella ) [80]). A number of these variables that impacted on the PEE rate at bottom (models 1a and 1b) affected oppositely the horizontal speed measured at surface with GPS location (model 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When high prey encounter rate is met, elephant seals adjust their diving behaviour by increasing both their descent and ascent angle (Figs 1 and 2), likely to minimize their transit time (Figs 5 and 6), and increase both their horizontal and vertical sinuosity during the bottom phase of their dive zigzagging within the prey patch layer (Figs 1 and 2). The negative relationship between the horizontal transit rate and putative feeding activity has been observed for numerous marine predators (SES [19] see also Figure A in S3 Appendix, northern elephant seals ( Mirounga angustirostris ) [79], wandering albatross ( Diomedea exulan ), antarctic fur seals ( Arctocephalus gazella ) [80]). A number of these variables that impacted on the PEE rate at bottom (models 1a and 1b) affected oppositely the horizontal speed measured at surface with GPS location (model 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Without that information we could not estimate the volume of water prospected by SES and compare it to the number of PEE in order to get an indication of prey density independent from SES behaviour (in PEE/m 3 instead of PEE per unit of SES bottom time). Additional studies may use 3D dive reconstructions [13,80,9193] to determine if the effect of the vertical extent of the bottom on the foraging success would be related to the presence/absence of small scale schooling-prey patches (leading to a small vertical extent of the bottom) or conversely, due to changes at a larger scale in the vertical aggregation of prey layers within the water column. We believe that the findings of this study are likely to be generalized to other air breathing divers foraging on small prey items such as mesopelagic fishes or crustaceans, but differences are likely to be found for diving predators foraging on large prey items.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Iwata et al . ; Williams et al . ), but such data have not been examined in the context of hierarchical movements because the analytical framework was not available to quantify the spatial scale of such 3D search behaviour (c.f.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fine-scale 3D dive paths and kinematics of diving animals have been reconstructed for several species to characterize foraging behaviour (e.g. Wilson & Wilson 1988;Davis et al 1999;Johnson & Tyack 2003;Aoki et al 2012;Goldbogen et al 2015;Iwata et al 2015;Williams et al 2015), but such data have not been examined in the context of hierarchical movements because the analytical framework was not available to quantify the spatial scale of such 3D search behaviour (c.f. Kotliar & Wiens 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Iwata et al . ), or aspects of whole body acceleration, for example, longitudinal surge (Sakamoto et al . ).…”
Section: Accelerometer Datamentioning
confidence: 99%