2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2017.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of pore geometry and orientation on the strength and stiffness of porous rock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
61
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
4
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the platy morphology of bassanite making it difficult to determine the exact micromechanical mechanisms in operation during deformation, there is clear evidence in the microstructures (Figure ) that support differences in mechanical evolution in relation to the loading path. It has been shown previously that different microstructural parameters such as pore geometry and orientation (Bubeck et al, ; Griffiths et al, ) and the nature of grain contacts (Louis et al, ) can produce significant strength anisotropy in porous rock. If microstructural properties evolve significantly during accumulation of inelastic shear strain, as in the deviatoric loading path of our experiments, this could produce a considerable change in the rock strength and in the shape of the yield curve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the platy morphology of bassanite making it difficult to determine the exact micromechanical mechanisms in operation during deformation, there is clear evidence in the microstructures (Figure ) that support differences in mechanical evolution in relation to the loading path. It has been shown previously that different microstructural parameters such as pore geometry and orientation (Bubeck et al, ; Griffiths et al, ) and the nature of grain contacts (Louis et al, ) can produce significant strength anisotropy in porous rock. If microstructural properties evolve significantly during accumulation of inelastic shear strain, as in the deviatoric loading path of our experiments, this could produce a considerable change in the rock strength and in the shape of the yield curve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strata orientation clearly acts as a weakness plane (Gatelier et al 2002). However, pore geometry and orientation between the pores and the direction of loading may also generate anisotropy (Bubeck et al 2017;Griffiths et al 2017), especially in volcanic rocks. The relation to the pore or initial crack orientation is particularly relevant since the fatigue process is inherently related to movement of the cracks.…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the grains in sandstones are typically orientated such that their pore major axis is sub-parallel to bedding (Louis et al 2003;Benson et al 2005;Robion et al 2014;Griffiths et al 2017;Farrell and Healy 2017), a higher permeability parallel to bedding is perhaps expected. Although we do not provide an average orientation for the pore or grain major axes of the Buntsandstein sandstones studied herein, we do note that their average grain aspect ratios are within the range 1.54-1.76 (Table 1).…”
Section: Matrix Permeability Of the Buntsandsteinmentioning
confidence: 99%