2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0379-0738(01)00593-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of polymer type, print donor and age on the quality of fingerprints developed on plastic substrates using vacuum metal deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
63
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
5
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference in optimal technique was found to be related to the paper chemical composition and surface free energy [7]. Other workers [9,10] have shown certain surfaces can give rise to reverse development of ridges and background when developed with VMD. Research groups also show latent print chemistry and development effectiveness is related to donor and time from deposition [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This difference in optimal technique was found to be related to the paper chemical composition and surface free energy [7]. Other workers [9,10] have shown certain surfaces can give rise to reverse development of ridges and background when developed with VMD. Research groups also show latent print chemistry and development effectiveness is related to donor and time from deposition [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Forensic casework and research laboratory studies show that latent fingerprint development efficiency can be affected by characteristics of the deposition surfaces as well as the donors [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further studies on fabric compared VMD and superglue fuming, which proved VMD to be more effective at developing fingermarks [14]. Despite the recent resurgence in VMD work and the price of VMD chambers dropping substantially over the last decade, very little has emerged recently comparing the efficiency of VMD in developing latent fingermarks on polymer banknotes, and other polymer substrates in general [15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that depth of penetration of fingermarks varies with types of paper, with a good correlation between penetration depth and quality of chemically developed prints [11][12][13][14][15]. Establishing the depth of penetration of prints into surfaces, as well as order of layers in, for instance, overprinting with text or images, can provide considerable assistance to crime-scene investigations by providing an insight into the history of documents for forensic studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%