1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf02362015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of physiological processes on tuber yield of potato clones (Solanum tuberosum L.): Stomatal diffusive resistance, stomatal conductance, gross photosynthetic rate, leaf canopy, tissue nutrient levels, and tuber enzyme activities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

1982
1982
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…monsoon, the evaporative demand decreased Sebago). DwELLE et al (1981bDwELLE et al ( , 1983 have and P-PET became positive. In the second year, shown, with several potato clones, that early planting in April resulted in the extension although individual leaves would reach maxiof the dry spell to a period of 10 weeks after mum photosynthetic rate at 60 % of full planting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…monsoon, the evaporative demand decreased Sebago). DwELLE et al (1981bDwELLE et al ( , 1983 have and P-PET became positive. In the second year, shown, with several potato clones, that early planting in April resulted in the extension although individual leaves would reach maxiof the dry spell to a period of 10 weeks after mum photosynthetic rate at 60 % of full planting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Genotypic differences in stomatal resistance in potato have been reported (Dwelle et al 1981;Levy et al 1989;Ekanayake and De Jong 1992), with clones that had higher resistance also exhibiting lower transpiration rates (Levy et al 1989). Drought tolerant plants are characterised by low stomatal resistance under irrigated conditions and high stomatal resistance under drought (Golestani Araghi and Assad 1998;Pinheiro et al 2005;Serrano and Penuelas 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Leaf area and PHOT were both highly correlated with TDW, but this does not necessarily imply causal relationships between TDW and these factors. In several studies, differences among cultivars in dry matter production are highly correlated with leaf area, but not with leaf photosynthesis rate (Dwelle et al, 1981;Shimshi and Susnoschi, 1985;Prange, 1987). This indicates that leaf area is the most important factor in light capture and plant growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%