1999
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Physical Attractiveness and Gender on Ultimatum Game Decisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
161
1
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 291 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
15
161
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Other options are, for example, that women selfselect themselves into certain occupations (e.g. Macpherson and Hirsch, 1995) and women cannot negotiate their salary as well as men do (e.g., Solnick and Schweitzer, 1999). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other options are, for example, that women selfselect themselves into certain occupations (e.g. Macpherson and Hirsch, 1995) and women cannot negotiate their salary as well as men do (e.g., Solnick and Schweitzer, 1999). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, researchers have found that attractive subjects get higher offers and therefore outperform their less attractive counterparts in simple bargaining games even without face-to-face interactions, such as the ultimatum game (Solnick and Schweitzer, 1999). Thus, employers in our experiment may expect more attractive workers to perform better in our bargaining task, and therefore incorporate these expectations in their wage offers.…”
Section: The Tasksmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The intersection of gender and the beauty premium has been a topic of several non-labor market studies (Solnick and Schweitzer, 1999;Rosenblat, 2008). We build upon this literature to find no systematic evidence that female or male workers benefit disproportionally from attractiveness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These findings suggest that people behave more generously or cooperatively towards physically attractive people. Solnick and Schweitzer (1999) show that attractive responders receive significantly higher offers than unattractive responders in the ultimatum game. In dictator games, Rosenblat (2008) shows that allocators treat physically and vocally attractive recipients more generously.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 86%