The Influence of Physical and Physiological Cues on Atomic Force Microscopy-Based Cell Stiffness Assessment

Abstract

Atomic force microscopy provides a novel technique for differentiating the mechanical properties of various cell types. Cell elasticity is abundantly used to represent the structural strength of cells in different conditions. In this study, we are interested in whether physical or physiological cues affect cell elasticity in Atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based assessments. The physical cues include the geometry of the AFM tips, the indenting force and the operating temperature of the AFM. All of these cues show a significant influence on the cell elasticity assessment. Sharp AFM tips create a two-fold increase in the value of the effective Young’s modulus (Eeff) relative to that of the blunt tips. Higher indenting force at the same loading rate generates higher estimated cell elasticity. Increasing the operation temperature of the AFM leads to decreases in the cell stiffness because the structure of actin filaments becomes disorganized. The physiological cues include the presence of fetal bovine serum or extracellular matrix-coated surfaces, the culture passage number, and the culture density. Both fetal bovine serum and the extracellular matrix are critical for cells to maintain the integrity of actin filaments and consequently exhibit higher elasticity. Unlike primary cells, mouse kidney progenitor cells can be passaged and maintain their morphology and elasticity for a very long period without a senescence phenotype. Finally, cell elasticity increases with increasing culture density only in MDCK epithelial cells. In summary, for researchers who use AFM to assess cell elasticity, our results provide basic and significant information about the suitable selection of physical and physiological cues.

The Position of the GFP Tag on Actin Affects the Filament Formation in Mammalian Cells

“…Comparison between GFP-actin and Actin-GFP set at 0.5 in this study referring to a previous study (Chiou et al, 2013), to evaluate Young's moduli of the tested cells as parameters of cell stiffness (Obataya et al, 2005). We used the Student's t-test comparing between control cells (EGFP) and each cell line expressing GFP tags for actin.…”

Matrix-Stiffness–Regulated Inverse Expression of Krüppel-Like Factor 5 and Krüppel-Like Factor 4 in the Pathogenesis of Renal Fibrosis

“…43 Fresh kidney tissue samples were sliced at a thickness of 100 mm with a microtome. Tissue slices were glued to a glass coverslip with a small drop of nail polish, and only the intact side of the cortex was immediately subjected to AFM measurements.…”

A quantitative study of MC3T3-E1 cell adhesion, morphology and biomechanics on chitosan–collagen blend films at single cell level

“…The cells are able to adjust their biophysical properties in response to external changes in environment conditions, causing changes in cell morphology, cytoskeleton, mechanical properties, and then influencing their migration, development [4], proliferation and differentiation [3]. It has been reported [5,6] that there was significant variation of cell mechanical properties cultured on various substrates. Moreover, cell mechanical properties and cell physiological pathology are closely related [7,8].…”